The Effect of Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery Technology Combined with Neurophysiological Monitoring in the Treatment of Brainstem Cavernous Hemangioma

Abstract

Abstract: Objective To analyze the curative effect of minimally invasive neurosurgery technique combined with neurophysiological monitoring on brainstem cavernous hemangioma. Methods 30 patients with brainstem cavernous hemangioma admitted to Linyi Central Hospital from January 2018 to January 2021 were selected and divided into control group (traditional brain microsurgery) and experimental group (minimally invasive neurosurgery technique + neurosurgery Electrophysiological monitoring) according to the random number table method, 15 patients in each group. The clinical efficacy, operation time, hospitalization time, the activities of daily living and functional status, the functional status of body and the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) of the two groups were compared. Results The total effective rate of treatment in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). The operation time and hospital stay in the experimental group were significantly shorter than those in the control group (P<0.05). The postoperative activities of daily living (ADL) in the experimental group were significantly shorter. The scores and functional status (KPS) scores were significantly higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). The postoperative GOS scores in the control group accounted for 40.00% of the scores from 1 to 3, 60.00% from 4 to 5, and 6.67% and 93.33% in the experimental group respectively, and there was a significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05). Conclusion Micro-invasive neurosurgery technology combined with nerve electrophysiology monitoring brainstem cavernous hemangioma has a significant curative effect, can effectively promote the recovery of the patient's body, improve the ability of daily activities and functional status, and has a significant effect on improving the quality of life and sleep quality,with high safety and significantly clinical reference.

Key words: minimally invasive neurosurgery techniques, neurophysiological monitoring, brainstem cavernous hemangioma

CLC Number:

R739.4

SU Ying, HUI Zhi-qiang, HUANG Jian, FU Tao, XU Peng. The Effect of Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery Technology Combined with Neurophysiological Monitoring in the Treatment of Brainstem Cavernous Hemangioma[J]. ZHONGHUA YANGSHENG BAOJIAN, 2022, 40(8): 10-13.

References

[1] 吴先良,梁斗,黄俏,等.多模态下神经电生理监测在神经外科手术中的应用效果分析[J].中国实用医药,2020,15(32):78-80.
[2] 李晓宇,张鸿祺,凌锋,等.脊髓海绵状血管畸形术中神经电生理监测:预警标准敏感性和特异性分析[J].中国现代神经疾病杂志,2020, 20(11):970-974.
[3] 张文瑞,何百祥,廉海平,等.多模式电生理监测在痉挛型脑瘫患者高选择性脊神经后根切断术中的应用[J].西安交通大学学报(医学版),2021,42(3):353-358.
[4] 邹敏刚,罗德芳,冯开明,等.导航联合神经电生理监测在脊髓栓系外科松解术中的应用[J].当代医学,2020,26(1):1-5.
[5] 王晓东,李育平,张恒柱.椎管后正中劈开复位术微创治疗脊髓髓内海绵状血管瘤一例报道[J].中华神经医学杂志,2019,18(3):291-292.
[6] 井晓荣,王超,张伟,等.长程视频脑电结合影像学在海绵状血管瘤伴发癫痫手术评估中的应用[J].立体定向和功能性神经外科杂志,2021,34(3):135-140.
[7] 侯哲,张洪兵,王浩,等.单侧部分半椎板入路显微手术治疗脊柱脊髓肿瘤[J].中国微侵袭神经外科杂志,2019,24(6):253-255.
[8] 杜威,丁慧超,姚国杰,等.神经导航及神经电生理辅助下显微手术治疗脑干海绵状血管瘤[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2020,25(10):670-673,700.
[9] 孔东生,孙正辉,武琛,等.脑干海绵状血管瘤术中扩散张量成像联合电生理学监测研究[J].中国现代神经疾病杂志,2017,17(5):370-375.
[10] 郭昌贵,李东海,徐春华,等.神经纤维瘤病1型合并颅内海绵状血管瘤1例[J].中国微侵袭神经外科杂志,2017,22(9):417-418.
[11] 王林,何芳,梅翠竹,等.多种电生理监测技术结合显微手术切除颈髓髓内肿瘤[J].中国微侵袭神经外科杂志,2020,25(1):17-20.
[12] 康剑,李维平,黄国栋,等.脑桥海绵状血管瘤的显微手术治疗[J].中国微侵袭神经外科杂志,2019,24(3):114-116.
[13] 梁杨,郑晓君,姜家奇,等.术中电生理监测对原发性面肌痉挛MVD预后的影响[J].中国微侵袭神经外科杂志,2021,26(3):127-128.
[14] 黄鑫,赵东刚,闫俊,等.电生理辅助下单侧脊髓丘脑侧束离断术治疗顽固性疼痛1例[J].中国微侵袭神经外科杂志,2019,24(5):230-231.