通过模拟器训练改善Perclose ProGlide血管缝合器系统的使用——一项回顾性队列研究

中华养生保健 ›› 2024, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4): 1-4.

• 论著 • 下一篇

通过模拟器训练改善Perclose ProGlide血管缝合器系统的使用——一项回顾性队列研究

胡桓睿¹, 谭清元², 蒲丹^3,*

1.四川大学华西医院普通外科血管外科,四川成都,610041;
2.四川大学华西医院胰腺炎中心,四川成都,610041;
3.四川大学华西医院肺癌中心,四川成都,610041

出版日期:2024-02-16 发布日期:2024-02-21
通讯作者: ^*蒲丹,E-mail：156775301@qq.com。
作者简介:胡桓睿（1989—）,男,汉族,籍贯：四川省凉山彝族自治州,博士研究生,讲师,研究方向：血管疾病。
基金资助:
四川省科技厅重点研发项目（2023YFS0302）

Improving the Use of Perclose ProGlide Vascular Suture System Through Simulator Training: A Retrospective Queue Study

HU Huan-rui¹, TAN Qing-yuan², PU Dan^3,*

1. Vascular Surgery Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan 610041, Chian;
2. Pancreatitis Center of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan 610041, Chian;
3. Lung Cancer Center of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan 610041, Chian

Online:2024-02-16 Published:2024-02-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的本研究旨在探究使用模拟器训练能否提高Perclose ProGlide血管缝合器系统使用的学习效率,以能更快、熟练地掌握缝合器系统。方法本研究采用回顾性队列研究,选择2020年9月—2022年9月在本中心进行培训的11名医师作为研究对象,将他们分为研究组与对照组,采用不同方式培训他们对于Perclose ProGlide血管缝合器系统的使用。对照组仅通过说明书及教学视频进行学习,研究组则在此基础上增加模拟器训练。两组医师在学习后各使用Perclose ProGlide血管缝合器系统对100例股动脉穿刺点进行缝合操作,统计并比较两组医师使用Perclose ProGlide血管缝合器系统结局的差异。结果两组医师使用Perclose ProGlide血管缝合器系统的成功率比较,差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。研究组的封堵器释放时间明显缩短,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）,缝合时患者的出血量也有所减少,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）,其余两组间研究结果比较,差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论模拟器的使用有助于加快血管外科医师对于Perclose ProGlide血管缝合器系统的掌握,使医师能在实际操作中操作更加熟练,并减少患者的出血。

关键词: 模拟器, 血管缝合器, 血管腔内治疗

Abstract: Objectives This study aims to assess whether training with simulators can improve the learning efficiency of the Perclose ProGlide vascular closure system, thereby accelerating proficiency and mastery of the closure system. Methods This study adopts a retrospective cohort design, selecting 11 physicians trained at this center from September 2020 to September 2022 as the study subjects. They are divided into a research group and a control group. Different training methods are employed for their use of the Perclose ProGlide vascular closure system. The control group learns only through manuals and instructional videos, while the research group adds simulator training. After the training, both groups of physicians use the Perclose ProGlide system to close the puncture site of the femoral artery in 100 cases, and the outcomes are compared. Results There is no statistically significant difference in the success rate of using the Perclose ProGlide vascular closure system between the two groups（P>0.05）. The research group shows a significantly shorter device release time（P<0.05）and a reduced bleeding volume during closure（P<0.05）. The comparison of research results between the other two groups showed no statistically significant difference (P>0.05). Conclusion The use of simulators contributes to accelerating vascular surgeons' mastery of the Perclose ProGlide vascular closure system, enabling physicians to operate more proficiently in actual procedures and reducing patient bleeding.

Key words: simulator, vascular sutures, endovascular therapy

中图分类号:

R608

胡桓睿, 谭清元, 蒲丹. 通过模拟器训练改善Perclose ProGlide血管缝合器系统的使用——一项回顾性队列研究[J]. 中华养生保健, 2024, 42(4): 1-4.

HU Huan-rui, TAN Qing-yuan, PU Dan. Improving the Use of Perclose ProGlide Vascular Suture System Through Simulator Training: A Retrospective Queue Study[J]. ZHONGHUA YANGSHENG BAOJIAN, 2024, 42(4): 1-4.

参考文献

[1] SELDINGER S I.Catheter replacement of the needle in percutaneous arteriography; a new technique[J]. Acta radiol,1953,39(5):368-376.
[2] NOORI V J, ELDRUP-JØRGENSEN J. A systematic review of vascular closure devices for femoral artery puncture sites[J]. J Vasc Surg,2018,68(3):887-899.
[3] FARGEN K M, HOH B L, MOCCO J.A prospective randomized single-blind trial of patient comfort following vessel closure: extravascular synthetic sealant closure provides less pain than a self-tightening suture vascular compression device[J]. J Neurointerv Surg,2011,3(3):219-223.
[4] NELSON P R, KRACJER Z, KANSAL N, et al.A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of totally percutaneous access versus open femoral exposure for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (the PEVAR trial)[J]. J Vasc Surg,2014,59(5):1181-1193.
[5] MARTIN J L, PRATSOS A, MAGARGEE E, et al.A randomized trial comparing compression, Perclose Proglide and Angio-Seal VIP for arterial closure following percutaneous coronary intervention: the CAP trial[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2008,71(1):1-5.
[6] BEHAN M W, LARGE J K, PATEL N R, et al.A randomised controlled trial comparing the routine use of an Angio-Seal STS device strategy with conventional femoral haemostasis methods in a district general hospital[J]. Int J Clin Pract,2007,61(3):367-372.
[7] COX T, BLAIR L, HUNTINGTON C, et al.Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Manual Compression to Vascular Closure Devices for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Arterial Procedures[J]. Surg Technol Int,2015,27:32-44.
[8] MAYER K, GEWALT S, MORATH T, et al.Comparison of Vascular Closure Devices vs Manual Compression After Femoral Artery Puncture in Patients on Oral Anticoagulation - Post Hoc Analysis of the ISAR-CLOSURE Trial[J]. J Invasive Cardiol,2021,33(9):E709-e715.
[9] SCHULZ-SCHÜPKE S, HELDE S, GEWALT S, et al. Comparison of vascular closure devices vs manual compression after femoral artery puncture: the ISAR-CLOSURE randomized clinical trial[J]. Jama,2014,312(19):1981-1987.
[10] KETTERLE J, RITTGER H, HELMIG I, et al.Comparison of Exo-Seal(^®) and Angio-Seal (^®) for arterial puncture site closure: A randomized, multicenter, single-blind trial[J]. Herz,2015,40(5):809-816.
[11] FAROOQ V, GOEDHART D, LUDMAN P, et al.Relationship Between Femoral Vascular Closure Devices and Short-Term Mortality From 271 845 Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Procedures Performed in the United Kingdom Between 2006 and 2011: A Propensity Score-Corrected Analysis From the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society[J]. Circ Cardiovasc Interv,2016,9(6):e003560.
[12] BIANCARI F, D’ANDREA V, DI MARCO C, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized trials on the efficacy of vascular closure devices after diagnostic angiography and angioplasty[J]. Am Heart J,2010,159(4):518-531.
[13] NOORI V J, ELDRUP-JØRGENSEN J. A systematic review of vascular closure devices for femoral artery puncture sites[J]. J asc urg, 2018,68(3):887-899.
[14] KENDRICK D E, GOSLING A F, NAGAVALLI A, et al.Endovascular Simulation Leads to Efficiency and Competence in Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Procedures[J]. J Surg Educ,2015,72(6):1158-1164.
[15] VENTO V, CERCENELLI L, MASCOLI C, et al.The Role of Simulation in Boosting the Learning Curve in EVAR Procedures[J]. J Surg Educ, 2018,75(2):534-540.
[16] DESENDER L M, VAN HERZEELE I, LACHAT M L, et al.Patient-specific Rehearsal Before EVAR: Influence on Technical and Nontechnical Operative Performance. A Randomized Controlled Trial[J]. Ann Surg, 2016,264(5):703-709.
[17] SARATZIS A, CALDERBANK T, SIDLOFF D, et al.Role of Simulation in Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) Training: A Preliminary Study[J]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg.2017,53(2):193-198.
[18] AMIN A, SALSAMENDI J, SULLIVAN T.High-fidelity endovascular simulation[J]. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol,2019,22(1):7-13.
[19] NAYAHANGAN L J, VAN HERZEELE I, KONGE L, et al.Achieving Consensus to Define Curricular Content for Simulation Based Education in Vascular Surgery: A Europe Wide Needs Assessment Initiative[J]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg,2019,58(2):284-291.
[20] AYDIN A, AHMED K, ABE T, et al.Effect of Simulation-based Training on Surgical Proficiency and Patient Outcomes: A Randomised Controlled Clinical and Educational Trial[J]. Eur Urol,2022,81(4):385-393.

通过模拟器训练改善Perclose ProGlide血管缝合器系统的使用——一项回顾性队列研究

Improving the Use of Perclose ProGlide Vascular Suture System Through Simulator Training: A Retrospective Queue Study

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价