欢迎您访问《中华养生保健》官方网站!

中华养生保健 ›› 2025, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5): 62-66.

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

乳腺钼靶X射线摄片联合CA15-3、CA125、CEA、CYFRA21-1对乳腺癌的临床诊断价值分析

王欣   

  1. 赤峰市医院放射科,内蒙古 赤峰,024000
  • 出版日期:2025-03-01 发布日期:2025-03-17
  • 作者简介:王欣(1978—),男,满族,籍贯:内蒙古自治区赤峰市,本科,副主任医师,研究方向:影像诊断与治疗。

Analysis of the Clinical Diagnostic Value of Breast Molybdenum Target X-ray Photography Combined with CA15-3, CA125, CEA, and CYFRA21-1 in Breast Cancer

WANG Xin   

  1. Radiolgy Department, Chifeng City Hospital, Chifeng Inner Mongolia 024000, China
  • Online:2025-03-01 Published:2025-03-17

摘要: 目的 分析乳腺钼靶X射线摄片联合糖类抗原15-3(CA15-3)、糖类抗原125(CA125)、癌胚抗原(CEA)、细胞角蛋白19片段抗原21-1(CYFRA21-1)对乳腺癌(BC)的临床诊断价值。方法 选取2023年5月—2024年1月赤峰市医院收治的78例BC患者为研究组,另选取80例乳腺良性病变患者为对照组。记录两组患者一般资料,用化学发光法测定肿瘤标志物(CA15-3、CA125、CEA、CYFRA21-1)水平,绘制受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线,用曲线下面积(AUC)分析单独使用上述肿瘤标志物、乳腺钼靶X射线摄片和两者联合运用的诊断价值。结果 研究组血清CA15-3、CA125、CEA、CYFRA21-1水平高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);CA15-3、CA125、CEA、CYFRA21-1与乳腺钼靶X射线摄片联合预测BC的敏感度为86.36%,特异度为84.21%,与单一指标相比联合诊断效能更高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);ROC曲线分析结果显示:CA15-3、CA125、CEA、CYFRA21-1与乳腺钼靶X射线摄片联合预测BC的AUC为0.903,与单一指标相比联合诊断价值更高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 CA15-3、CA125、CEA、CYFRA21-1、乳腺钼靶X射线摄片对BC均具有良好的预测价值,两者联合预测效能更佳。

关键词: 乳腺癌, 乳腺钼靶X射线摄片, 肿瘤标志物

Abstract: Objective To analyze the clinical diagnostic value of X-ray combined with glycoantigen 15-3 (CA15-3), sugar antigen 125 (CA125), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and cytokeratin 19 fragment antigen 21-1 (CYFRA21-1) in breast cancer (BC). Methods A total of 78 BC patients admitted to our hospital from May 2023 to January 2024 were selected as the study group, and another 80 patients with benign breast lesions were selected as the control group. Baseline data of both groups were recorded, the levels of tumor markers (CA15-3, CA125, CEA, CYFRA21-1) were determined by chemiluminescence, the working characteristics (ROC) curve was drawn, and the area under the curve (AUC) was used to analyze the diagnostic value of tumor markers and mammo X-ray photography alone and in combination. Results The serum CA15-3, CA125, CEA and CYFRA21-1 in the study group were higher than the control group, statistically different (P<0.05); ROC curve analysis showed that the AUC of tumor marker and mammo X-ray was 0.903, sensitivity of 86.36%, specificity of 84.21%, and higher predictive value than the single index, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion The level of CA15-3, CA125, CEA, CYFRA21-1 and mammography X-ray photography all have good predictive value for BC, and the combined prediction efficiency of both is better.

Key words: breast cancer, mammolybdenum X-ray, tumor marker

中图分类号: