欢迎您访问《中华养生保健》官方网站!

中华养生保健 ›› 2025, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (1): 85-89.

• 教育管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

采用迈尔斯-布里格斯类型指标评估人格类型与医学生学习成绩的相关性

程扬帆, 张斯睿, 魏倩倩, 商慧芳*   

  1. 四川大学华西医院神经内科, 四川 成都, 610041
  • 出版日期:2025-01-01 发布日期:2025-01-14
  • 通讯作者: *商慧芳,E-mail:hfshang2002@126.com。
  • 作者简介:程扬帆(1996—),女,汉族,籍贯:甘肃省兰州市,博士研究生,助理研究员,研究方向:神经遗传与变性疾病。

Use the Myers-Briggs Type Index to Assess the Correlation of Personality Type and Academic Performance of Medical Students

CHENG Yang-fan, ZHANG Si-rui, WEI Qian-qian, SHANG Hui-fang*   

  1. Department of Neurology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan 610041, China
  • Online:2025-01-01 Published:2025-01-14

摘要: 目的 采用迈尔斯-布里格斯类型指标(MBTI)作为一种新型评估工具,对医学生的不同人格特质进行评估,并将这些特质与学习成绩和综合表现相关联,深入了解不同人格特质对医学生学习成绩的影响。方法 通过问卷星软件建立在线问卷,收集2023年10—11月四川大学华西临床医学院八年制临床医学专业五年级的所有医学生的人口学、MBTI性格偏好和学习成绩等资料并进行多变量线性回归分析。结果 研究共招募37名参与者,参与者在年龄、性别、身体质量指数和饮酒状况方面比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。外向(E)组/内向(I)组、思考(T)组/情感(F)组、判断(J)组/展望(P)组之间的学习成绩和综合得分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。只有感觉(S)组和直觉(N)组的学习成绩比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而综合成绩比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 N型人格学生的学习成绩可能高于S型人格学生。这项研究为教育管理者制订个性化教学策略提供了宝贵的见解。

关键词: 学习成绩, 医学生, 迈尔斯-布里格斯类型指标(MBTI), 教学策略

Abstract: Objective The Myers-Briggs type Index (MBTI) was used as a novel assessment tool to assess different personality traits of medical students and correlate these traits with academic performance and comprehensive performance to gain insight into the impact of different personality traits on academic performance of medical students. Methods An online questionnaire was established through the questionnaire star software, collecting the demographic,MBTI personality preference and academic performance of all medical students in the eight-year clinical medicine major of Sichuan University from October to November 2023,and the multivariable linear regression analysis was conducted. Results A total of 37 participants were recruited, as compared by age, sex, body mass index and drinking status(P>0.05).No difference of academic performance and composite scores between outgoing (E) / introverted (I), thinking (T) and emotional (F),judgment (J) and outlook (P)(P>0.05).Only the sensory (S) and intuition (N) groups showed statistically significant differences (P<0.05),while the overall scores were not statistically significant differences(P>0.05). Conclusion The academic performance of N type students might be higher than that of S type students. This study provides invaluable insights for educational administrators to develop individualized teaching strategies.

Key words: academic performance, medical students, Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), instructional strategies

中图分类号: