欢迎您访问《中华养生保健》官方网站!

中华养生保健 ›› 2024, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (9): 169-173.

• 经验交流 • 上一篇    下一篇

超声心动图多参数评分对心力衰竭患者预后的风险评估价值

李娜   

  1. 西安市阎良区中医医院超声科,陕西 西安,710089
  • 出版日期:2024-05-01 发布日期:2024-04-23
  • 作者简介:李娜(1979—),女,汉族,籍贯:陕西省西安市,本科,主治医师,研究方向:腹部、血管、心脏超声检查。

The Risk Assessment Value of Multi-parameter Echocardiography Score for Prognosis of Heart Failure Patients

LI Na   

  1. Department of Ultrasound, Yanliang District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Xi'an Shaanxi, 710089, China
  • Online:2024-05-01 Published:2024-04-23

摘要: 目的 探讨与分析超声心动图多参数评分对心力衰竭患者预后的风险评估价值。方法 选取2019年2月—2021年5月在西安市阎良区中医医院住院治疗的心力衰竭患者72例作为研究对象,所有患者都给予超声心动图检查,记录患者的超声心动图多参数评分。调查、记录所有患者主要心血管不良事件(Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events,MACE)发生情况并进行相关性分析。结果 在72例患者中,随访2年,发生主要心血管不良事件22例(MACE组),占比30.6%。MACE组患者的心率、性别比、年龄、体重指数、收缩压、舒张压等与非MACE组对比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。MACE组患者的左心房内径、左心室舒张末期内径、Tei指数明显高于非MACE组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);二尖瓣舒张早期血流速度(E)/二尖瓣舒张晚期血流速度(A)值与非MACE组对比,明显降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。MACE组患者的左室舒张末期容积指数、左室收缩末期容积指数明显高于非MACE组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组心尖段射血分数、中间段射血分数、基底段射血分数对比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。在72例患者中,Spearman分析显示心力衰竭患者的左室舒张末期容积指数、左室收缩末期容积指数、左心房内径、左心室舒张末期内径、Tei 指数、E/A值与随访预后主要心血管不良事件的发生存在相关性。结论 心力衰竭患者预后主要心血管不良事件的发生率比较高,超声心动图多参数评分对心力衰竭患者预后的风险评估具有很好的价值。

关键词: 心力衰竭, 主要心血管不良事件, 超声心动图, 相关性, 左心室舒张末期内径, Tei指数, 左室舒张末期容积指数

Abstract: Objective To explore and analysis the risk assessment value of multi parameter echocardiography scoring in the prognosis of heart failure patients. Methods 72 cases patients with heart failure who were hospitalized at Yanliang District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from February 2019 to May 2021 were selected as the research subjects. All patients were subjected to echocardiography examination and their multiparameter echocardiography scores were recorded. The major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in all patients were recorded, and correlation analysis was conducted. Results In the 72 patients, there were 22 cases(MACE group) had major cardiovascular adverse events during a 2-year follow-up, accounted for 30.6%. There were no significant differences in heart rate, gender, age, body mass index, systolic and diastolic blood pressure compared between the MACE group and the non MACE group (P>0.05). The left atrial diameter, left ventricular end diastolic diameter, and Tei index of the MACE group were significantly higher than those of the non MACE group (P<0.05), and the E/A value were significantly lower compared to the non MACE group (P<0.05). The left ventricular end diastolic volume index and left ventricular end systolic volume index in the MACE group were significantly higher than those in the non MACE group (P<0.05). There were no significant difference in the apical ejection fraction, middle ejection fraction, and basal ejection fraction between the two groups (P>0.05). In the 72 patients with heart failure, Spearman analysis showed that the incidence of MACE was related with left ventricular end diastolic volume index, left ventricular end systolic volume index, left atrial diameter, left ventricular end diastolic diameter, Tei index, E/A value after follow-up (P<0.05). Conclusion The incidence of MACE in the prognosis of heart failure patients is relatively high, and the multi-parameter score of echocardiography has great value in assessing the risk of prognosis in heart failure patients.

Key words: heart failure, major cardiovascular adverse events, echocardiography, correlation, left ventricular end diastolic diameter, Tei index, left ventricular end-diastolic volume index

中图分类号: