低剂量CT扫描在CT定位引导下椎体成形术中的应用价值

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨与分析低剂量CT扫描在CT定位引导下椎体成形术中的应用价值。方法选取2022年1月—2022年12月在甘肃省兰州市榆中县中医院诊治的108例骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折（OVCF）患者作为研究对象,根据随机数表法将患者分为研究组与对照组,每组54例。对照组给予传统数字X线摄影定位引导,研究组给予低剂量CT扫描定位引导,研究组与对照组都给予椎体成形术（PVP）治疗,记录与判定两组患者的预后情况。结果两组患者术后7 d的疼痛视觉模拟量表（VAS）评分都明显低于术前1 d,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）,研究组术后7 d的疼痛VAS评分显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。两组患者术后3个月的腰椎Oswestry量表（ODI）评分都明显低于术前1 d,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）,研究组术后3个月的腰椎ODI评分显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。两组患者术后3个月的Cobb角都明显低于术前1 d,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）,研究组术后3个月的Cobb角与对照组对比有显著降低（P<0.05）。研究组的一次穿刺成功率为98.15%,显著高于对照组的83.33%,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）,研究组患者的骨水泥注入量、骨水泥渗漏量都显著少于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论低剂量CT扫描在CT定位引导下椎体成形术中的应用能提高一次穿刺成功率,减少患者的骨水泥注入量、骨水泥渗漏量,促进缓解患者的疼痛,改善患者的腰椎功能,减小患者的Cobb角。

关键词: 低剂量CT扫描, 椎体成形术, 骨水泥渗漏, 腰椎功能, Cobb角

Abstract: Objective To explore and analyze the application value of low-dose CT scanning in CT guided vertebroplasty. Methods From January 2022 to December 2022, 108 cases of patients with osteoporotic vertebral compressibility fracture (OVCF) who were diagnosed and treated in Yuzhong County Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, Gansu were selected as the study subjects. Accorded to the random number table method, the patients were divided into 54 cases in study group and 54 cases in control group. The control group were received traditional digital X-ray imaging localization guidance, while the study group were received low-dose CT scanning localization guidance, and both groups were received percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) treatment. All the prognosis of the two groups of patients were recorded and compared. Result The differece between the pain VAS score at 7 days after the surgery and the score at the day before the surgery in either group of patients was statistically significant (P<0.05), with the former lower than the latter. And the lumbar ODI, Cobb angle were different in both groups from the day before and 3 months after the surgery, and these indicators were also significantly different between groups at 3 months after the surgery(P<0.05), with the former lower than the latter. The success rates of puncture by a one-time attempt were 98.15% vs. 83.33% in study group and control group, respectively(P<0.05). The amount of cement injection and cement leakage in study group were significantly lower than those in control group (P<0.05). Conclusion The application of low-dose CT scanning in CT guided vertebroplasty can improve the success rate of puncture by a one-time attempt, reduce the amount of bone cement injection and leakage in patients, promote pain relief, improve lumbar function, and reduce Cobb angle.

Key words: low-dose CT scanning, vertebroplasty, bone cement leakage, lumbar function, Cobb angle

中图分类号:

R687.3

牛爱芸. 低剂量CT扫描在CT定位引导下椎体成形术中的应用价值[J]. 中华养生保健, 2024, 42(7): 163-166.

NIU Ai-yun. The Application Value of Low-Dose CT Scanning in CT Guided Vertebroplasty[J]. ZHONGHUA YANGSHENG BAOJIAN, 2024, 42(7): 163-166.

参考文献

[1] 陈娇,张义.双能量计算机断层扫描检查对骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折患者的临床应用价值[J].中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2019,12(5):136-140.
[2] 张建乔,俞伟,曾忠友,等.肌间隙入路经椎弓根基底外侧壁椎体内打压植骨联合椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗Ⅱ~Ⅲ期Kümmell病[J].中医正骨,2023,35(1):63-69.
[3] 张桂川,尤连波,葛海,等.基于DR、CT及MRI多征象探讨经皮胸腰椎体成形术后骨水泥渗漏危险因素[J].中国CT和MRI杂志,2023,21(2):151-154.
[4] 关健斌,冯宁宁,俞兴,等.椎体分区CT值与经皮椎体成形后骨水泥分布的相关性[J].中国组织工程研究,2023,27(30):4757-4762.
[5] 孙玲娟,宋西正,李达明,等.脊柱外固定装置牵张下经皮椎体成形治疗后壁破损椎体骨质疏松压缩骨折[J].中国组织工程研究,2023,27(31):4954-4958.
[6] 刘成洲,贾宝欣,高晓强,等.骨水泥2次推注与一次性推注完成在降低椎体成形术中骨水泥渗漏风险及术后相关并发症中的对比研究[J].中国伤残医学,2023,31(1):1-4,56.
[7] 高超,郁春,管礼安,等.骨质疏松性胸腰椎骨折经皮椎体成形术后骨水泥分布类型对疗效的影响[J].中国医药导报,2023,20(3):84-87.
[8] 中国康复医学会骨质疏松预防与康复专业委员会.骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折诊治专家共识(2021版)[J].中华医学杂志, 2021, 101(41):3371-3379.
[9] 王长松,曾宪发,肖红丽.定量CT骨密度对经皮椎体成形术后骨折复发预测价值研究[J].现代医药卫生,2023,39(5):741-746.
[10] 岳琨,贾巍,张吉,等.椎体成形术中应用Innova CT进行质量控制浅析[J].实用放射学杂志,2022,38(10):1693-1695.
[11] 刘悦,李丽梅,张志利,等.三维CT引导下经皮椎体成形术与经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗椎体转移瘤的疗效分析[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2022,37(5):509-511.
[12] 蔡明,戚颖,刘肃,等.骨水泥不同分布对骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折的生物力学影响:三维有限元分析[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2022,39(6):771-777.
[13] 唐本强,王彦辉,许崧杰,等.骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折经皮椎体强化术后椎体内骨水泥分布类型的研究进展[J].中华骨科杂志,2022,42(5):320-330.
[14] 孔亮,郭艾,孟海,等.单双侧穿刺经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的对比研究[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2022,21(15):1634-1638.
[15] 郝国兵,朱泽兴,刘昆,等.采用“双侧垂直错位穿刺法”与“双侧水平裂隙穿刺法”行经皮椎体成形术在治疗Ⅰ期Kümmell病的疗效对比[J].生物骨科材料与临床研究,2022,19(6):30-37.
[16] 付海军,冯毅,武太勇,等.经皮椎体成形术椎间盘骨水泥渗漏对相邻椎体生物力学影响的有限元分析[J].北京生物医学工程,2022,41(2):140-147.
[17] 詹乙,王彪,马宇立,等.新型骨水泥螺钉系统固定迟发性椎体骨折后骨坏死模型的生物力学评估[J].中国组织工程研究,2022,26(18):2795-2800.
[18] 张勋,孟凡超,庞倩文,等.腰椎经皮穿刺球囊扩张椎体成形手术理想骨水泥形态分布及注射量的有限元分析[J].哈尔滨医科大学学报,2022,56(1):36-41.
[19] 王德国,李洋,尹红灵,等.椎体成形术填充剂最优化分布模式三维有限元分析[J].中国骨伤,2021,34(1):26-33.
[20] 刘家寅,刘兰泽,孙汝涛,等.联合复位椎体成形术与椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体骨折效果分析[J].中国综合临床,2022,38(3):250-255.