主动固定电极对心脏起搏器置入术患者心室起搏参数的影响

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨与分析主动固定电极对心脏起搏器置入术患者心室起搏参数的影响。方法选择2020年1月—2023年4月新疆生产建设兵团第二师库尔勒医院收治的需安置埋藏式心脏起搏器的85例患者作为研究对象,根据随机掷骰子原则把85例患者分为主动组（43例）与被动组（42例）。主动组采用主动固定电极行右室流出道间隔部、希氏束起搏治疗,被动组采用被动固定电极行右室心尖部起搏治疗,记录与观察两组心室起搏参数变化情况。结果主动组起搏器置入即刻的心室起搏参数起搏阈值、阻抗、P波幅度、电流均明显低于被动组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。主动组电极置入时间、曝光时间均长于被动组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。主动组电极置入后7 d起搏系统感染、下肢深静脉血栓、起搏电极脱位、起搏功能障碍等并发症发生率明显低于被动组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。主动组的下肢制动时间、住院时间、临时心脏起搏电极留置时间均短于被动组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论主动固定电极在心脏起搏器置入术患者中的应用能改善其心室起搏参数,增加患者的电极置入时间、曝光时间,减少右心尖起搏带来的心室非同步的电激动,降低患者的并发症发生率,改善患者的总体预后。

关键词: 主动固定电极, 心脏起搏器置入术, 心室起搏参数, 右室心尖部, 被动固定电极

Abstract: Objective To explore and analysis the effects of active fixed electrodes on ventricular pacing parameters in patients undergoing pacemaker implantation. Methods A total of 85 cases of patients who were admitted to Korla Hospital of the Second Division of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps from January 2020 to April 2023 and required the placement of an implantable pacemaker were selected as the research subjects. Accorded to the random dice principle, 85 patients were divided into the active group of 43 cases and the passive group of 42 cases. The active group were treated with right ventricular outflow tract septum and Higgins bundle pacing using active fixation electrodes, while the passive group were treated with right ventricular apical pacing using passive fixation electrodes. The changes in ventricular pacing parameters were recorded and observed in both groups. Results The ventricular pacing parameters-pacing threshold, impedance, and P-wave amplitude immediately after pacemaker implantation in the active group were significantly lower than those in the passive group (P<0.05), and the current were significantly reduced compared to the passive group (P<0.05). The electrode placement time and exposure time of the active group were significantly increased compared to the passive group (P<0.05). The incidence of pacemaker system infection, lower limb deep vein thrombosis, pacemaker electrode dislocation, pacemaker dysfunction and other complications were 2.33% in the active group and 19.05% in the passive group 7 days after electrode implantation, which were significantly lower in the active group than in the passive group (P<0.05). The lower limb immobilization time, hospitalization time, and temporary cardiac pacing electrode retention time in the active group were significantly reduced compared to the passive group (P<0.05). Conclusion The application of actively fixation electrodes in patients undergoing pacemaker implantation can improve ventricular pacing parameters,increase electrode insertion time and exposure time, reduce ventricular asynchronous electrical stimulation caused by right apex pacing, reduce the incidence of complications, and improve the overall prognosis of patients.

Key words: actively fixation electrodes, pacemaker implantation surgery, ventricular pacing parameters, right ventricular apex, passive fixation electrodes

中图分类号:

R541

刘一鸣, 吕静. 主动固定电极对心脏起搏器置入术患者心室起搏参数的影响[J]. 中华养生保健, 2024, 42(5): 44-47.

LIU Yi-ming, LYU Jing. Effect of Active Fixed Electrodes on Ventricular Pacing Parameters in Patients Undergoing Pacemaker Placement[J]. ZHONGHUA YANGSHENG BAOJIAN, 2024, 42(5): 44-47.

参考文献

[1] 贺翔,蒋靖波,潘迪光,等.经股静脉植入主动固定电极与被动固定电极行临时心脏起搏的有效性和安全性比较[J].临床内科杂志,2022,39(10):667-670.
[2] 蔡迟,华伟,黄灏,等.犬左束支区域起搏与心室不同部位起搏的心电学及急性血流动力学比较研究[J].中国心血管病研究,2022,20(8):726-731.
[3] 王珍,陈倩,黄容,等.左束支起搏在心力衰竭合并房室传导阻滞患者中的临床疗效初步研究[J].临床心血管病杂志,2022,38(9):743-748.
[4] 高阳,李苗苗,于海波,等.不同房室传导阻滞部位患者的希氏-浦肯野系统起搏成功率[J].中华心血管病杂志,2022,50(6):543-548.
[5] 翁俊飞,董薇,刘雷雷,等.左心室多位点起搏在非特异性室内传导阻滞伴低射血分数心力衰竭患者治疗中的应用[J].介入放射学杂志,2022,31(1):14-18.
[6] 何金山,段江波,李思聪,等.感染性心内膜炎患者电极拔除后采用主动固定电极连接体外永久起搏器进行过渡治疗的安全性探讨[J].中华心血管病杂志,2022,50(12):1214-1219.
[7] 郑文成,李鼎,李学斌,等.心脏再同步化治疗起搏器左室电极的拔除与再植入:中国单中心经验[J].中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志,2019,33(4):307-311.
[8] 赵璐露,华宝桐,陈丽玲,等.高频右心房起搏建立犬心房颤动模型和植入式心电监测器的评估[J].中国比较医学杂志,2019,29(9):17-25.
[9] 刘艳军,闫杰,高灵犀,等.永存左上腔静脉伴右上腔静脉缺如患者植入永久心脏起搏器一例[J].中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志,2019,33(3):287-288.
[10] 吴悦,翁思贤,郭涛,等.内外科联合拔除起搏器感染电极1例[J].中国分子心脏病学杂志,2019,19(6):3135-3136.
[11] 杨艳,刘凡.主动固定电极起搏器植入术中起博阈值和心肌损伤标记物变化的观察[J].基因组学与应用生物学,2018,37(3):976-982.
[12] 朱男,李晓刚,马洁,等.长期置入不同类型起搏器对高龄缓慢性心律失常患者心脏功能的影响[J].西部医学,2023,35(3):386-389,395.
[13] 喻瑜,华伟.希氏-浦肯野系统起搏用于治疗起搏诱导性心肌病的临床研究进展[J].心血管病学进展,2022,43(6):481-484.
[14] 戴文龙,李巧元,单亮,等.使用通用钢丝支撑导线行左束支区域起搏的初步临床观察[J].中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志,2022,36(4):307-310.
[15] 金琪琪,林佳选,薛杨静,等.R Ⅲ/S Ⅲ比值预测邻近希氏束旁室性心律失常消融成功的价值[J].中华心律失常学杂志,2022,26(5):473-479.
[16] 张磊,刘丽,智昱,等.无导线房室同步起搏器植入术后房扑消融1例[J].临床心电学杂志,2022,31(1):61-62.
[17] 李金媛,叶凤兰,马惠文.跨理论模型配合康复护理对主动固定电极起搏器植入术患者的影响[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2021,27(20):135-137.
[18] 于丰源,孙奇.希氏束不应期左心室刺激鉴别窄QRS波心动过速1例[J].中华心律失常学杂志,2022,26(4):395-397.
[19] 王禹川,黄波,陈夏欢,等.5例超过90岁患者永久起搏器植入体会[J].中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志,2021,35(6):534-536.
[20] 蒋丽梦,戴振宇,苏蓝.损伤电流在不同类型心脏起搏中的临床价值[J].中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志,2021,35(3):201-205.