欢迎您访问《中华养生保健》官方网站!

中华养生保健 ›› 2024, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5): 19-22.

• 中医诊疗 • 上一篇    下一篇

浮针治疗急性非特异性腰背痛临床研究

霍青云1,2, 赵玉玲2, 李伟2, 路敏2, 覃国忠2, 于翱瑞2, 许宏武3,*   

  1. 1.汕头大学医学院,广东 汕头,515000;
    2.深圳平乐骨伤科医院(深圳市坪山区中医院)平乐郭氏正骨科,广东 深圳,518000;
    3.汕头大学医学院第一附属医院神经外科,广东 汕头,515000
  • 出版日期:2024-03-01 发布日期:2024-02-27
  • 通讯作者: *许宏武,E-mail:hwxu@qq.com。
  • 作者简介:霍青云(1989—),男,汉族,籍贯:河南省开封市,硕士研究生在读,主治中医师,研究方向:中西医结合骨伤科学。
  • 基金资助:
    深圳市医疗卫生“三名工程”项目资助(SZZYSM202108013); 福建中医药大学校管课题(XB20232220)

Clinical Study on Treatment of Acute Nonspecific Low Back Pain with Floating Needle

HUO Qing-Yun1,2, ZHAO Yu-Ling2, LI Wei2, LU- Min2, TAN Guo-Zhong2, YU Ao-Rui2, XU Hong-Wu3,*   

  1. 1. Shantou University Medical College, Shantou Guangdong 515000, China;
    2. Pingle Guo's Orthopedic Department, Shenzhen Pingle Orthopedic Hospital (Shenzhen Pingshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine), Shenzhen Guangdong 515000, China;
    3. Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou Guangdong 515000, China
  • Online:2024-03-01 Published:2024-02-27

摘要: 目的 研究浮针治疗急性非特异性腰背痛的临床疗效、慢性转归率和安全性。方法 选取2020年1月—2023年6月深圳平乐骨伤科医院(深圳市坪山区中医院)收治的急性非特异性腰背痛患者256例,根据患者治疗方式不同分为浮针组和对照组,浮针组129例,对照组127例。两组患者均予中药封包治疗,对照组加服洛芬待因缓释片、盐酸乙哌立松片,浮针组在上述治疗基础上再加用浮针治疗,比较两组患者临床疗效、复发率、腰部疼痛[视觉疼痛模拟分法(VAS)评分]、腰部功能障碍[腰椎功能障碍指数评分量表(ODI)评分]、指地间距(FFD)。结果 治疗前两组患者VAS评分、ODI评分、FFD比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后,两组患者VAS评分、ODI评分、FFD较治疗前显著下降,且浮针组VAS评分、ODI评分、FFD均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。浮针组复发率低于对照组,临床疗效高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 浮针治疗急性非特异性腰背痛能够快速高效地降低痛感、改善腰背功能,降低复发率,近期疗效和远期疗效较好,值得临床应用。

关键词: 皮下筋膜, 肌筋膜, 浮针, 急性非特异性腰背痛

Abstract: Objective To study the clinical efficacy, chronic outcome rate and safety of acute nonspecific low back pain with floating needle. Methods A total of 256 patients with acute non-specific low back pain from January 1, 2020 to June, 2023 at Shenzhen Pingle Orthopedic and Traumatology Hospital (Shenzhen Pingshan District Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital) were selected, depending on the patient's treatment method, they were randomly divided into a floating needle group and a control group, with 129 cases in the floating needle group and 127 cases in the control group. Both groups of patients were treated with traditional Chinese medicine package, and the control group was treated with Ibuprofen codeine sustained-release tablets and Eperisone hydrochloride tablets. The floating needle group was treated with floating needle on the basis of the above treatment; Compare the clinical efficacy, lumbar pain score (VAS), lumbar dysfunction index score (ODI), and finger to ground distance (FFD) between two groups of patients. Results There was no statistically significant difference in general condition, VAS, ODI and FFD between the two groups of patients before treatment (P>0.05).After treatment, the VAS, ODI and FFD of the two groups of patients showed a significant downward trend compared to before treatment (P<0.05). The clinical efficacy, recurrence rate, VAS, ODI and FFD of the floating needle group were higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Floating needle treatment of acute nonspecific low back pain can quickly and efficiently reduce pain, improve low back function, reduce the recurrence rate, short-term efficacy and long-term efficacy is good, worthy of clinical application.

Key words: subcutaneous fascia, myofascia, floating needle, acute non-specific low back pain

中图分类号: