欢迎您访问《中华养生保健》官方网站!

中华养生保健 ›› 2024, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5): 163-166.

• 经验交流 • 上一篇    下一篇

热敷眼保健操仪对儿童青少年视力的作用效果评价

沈郁1, 高雷1, 李娟娟1, 孟佳1, 顾昉1, 邹艳1, 童君龙2, 章荣华1,*   

  1. 1.浙江省疾病预防控制中心营养与食品安全所,浙江 杭州,310058;
    2.中国关心下一代健康体育基金会,浙江 宁波,315100
  • 出版日期:2024-03-01 发布日期:2024-02-27
  • 通讯作者: *章荣华,E-mail:rhzhang@cdc.zj.cn。
  • 作者简介:沈郁(1993—),女,汉族,籍贯:浙江省嘉兴市,硕士研究生,主治医师,研究方向:学校卫生。

Effect of Eye Exercises Machine on Vision Improvement of Children

SHEN Yu1, GAO Lei1, LI Juan-juan1, MENG Jia1, GU Fang1, ZOU Yan1, TONG Jun-long2, ZHANG Rong-hua1,*   

  1. 1. Department of Nutrition and Food Safety, Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou Zhejiang, 310058, China;
    2. China Care for the Next Generation of Healthy Sports Foundation, Ningbo Zhejiang, 315100, China
  • Online:2024-03-01 Published:2024-02-27

摘要: 目的 观察应用某款热敷眼保健操仪对改善儿童青少年视力的有效性。方法 采用整群抽样选取浙江省杭州市、宁波市、温州市、湖州市共9所小学的18个三年级学生进行前瞻性研究,其中9个班级为干预组,9个班级为对照组。干预组使用热敷眼保健操仪两学期,对照组照常做眼保健操。在开始干预后的第一学期始末、第二学期始末均进行视力验光检查和眼部症状问卷调查,观察比较干预前后两组学生的视力情况。结果 研究共纳入713名学生。干预前后,干预组和对照组学生近视率比较,差异无统计学意义(38.58% VS 37.73%,χ2=0.028,P=0.866);调整年龄、性别、惯用手、户外活动时间、灯光使用情况、父母近视情况等混杂因素后,在干预后的3次视力检查中,干预组学生出现1次近视诊断的发生率显著低于对照组(OR=0.39,95%CI=0.22~0.71,P=0.002)。干预前,两组学生眼部症状比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);经过两学期干预后,干预组学生视物模糊的发生率显著低于对照组(29.25% VS 40.37%,χ2=10.139,P=0.001)。结论 使用热敷眼保健操仪可以改善儿童青少年眼部不适症状,对视力尚不稳定且可能即将近视的儿童青少年具有一定的保护作用,能预防和延缓近视的发生发展,对于降低学校学生近视率起到积极的作用。

关键词: 儿童青少年, 近视, 热敷眼保健操仪

Abstract: Objective To explore the effect of eye exercises machine for improvement of vision of children. Methods A total of 18 third grade classes of primary schools from Hangzhou, Wenzhou, Ningbo and Huzhou were selected, among them 9 were intervention group, and others were control group. Students of intervention group used eye exercises machine instead of normal eye exercises, and those of control group did eye exercises. Visual acuity optometry and questionnaire for ocular symptoms were completed at the beginnings and ends of first and second terms. Results 713 students were included. There was no significant difference of myopia prevalence between intervention and control group (38.58% VS 37.73%, χ2=0.028, P=0.866). After age, gender, dominant hand, outdoor time, lamp types and myopia prevalence of parents were adjusted, among 3 times of visual acuity optometry after intervention, students of intervention group who were diagnosed myopia once were significantly more than those of control group (OR=0.39, 95%CI=0.22~0.71, P=0.002). Before intervention, there were no significant differences of ocular symptoms between two groups (P>0.05). After two terms of intervention, prevalence of blurred vision of intervention group was lower than that of control group (29.25% VS 40.37%, χ2=10.139, P=0.001). Conclusion Eye exercises machine could improve ocular symptoms of children, and might had protective effects on those with unstable vision and probably nearsighted.

Key words: children, myopia, eye exercises machine

中图分类号: