双向质量反馈管理对肝硬化合并UGB的效果及对患者SRSS评分的影响

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨应用双向质量反馈管理对肝硬化合并上消化道出血（UGB）患者的干预效果及对患者睡眠状况自评量表（SRSS）评分的影响。方法选取2020年10月—2023年11月泰安市中医医院收治的100例肝硬化合并UGB患者作为研究对象,按照随机数表法将其分为对照组与观察组,各50例。对照组采用常规护理干预方法,观察组采用常规护理+双向质量反馈管理方法,比较两组的干预效果、自我管理能力改善情况、心理状态及睡眠质量。结果观察组的止血时间、住院时间短于对照组,住院费用少于对照组,住院期间再出血发生率、焦虑自评量表（SAS）评分、抑郁自评量表（SDS）评分以及SRSS评分均低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）;观察组的肝硬化自我管理行为量表评分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论双向质量反馈管理对肝硬化合并UGB患者具有显著的干预效果,能够有效提高患者的自我管理能力,并改善其心理状态和睡眠质量,缩短康复进程。

关键词: 双向质量反馈管理, 肝硬化, 上消化道出血, 睡眠质量

Abstract: Objective To explore the effect of two-way quality feedback management on liver cirrhosis complicated with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGB) and its influence on sleep self-rating scale (SRSS) score. Methods A total of 100 patients with cirrhosis and UGB admitted to Tai 'an Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from October 2020 to November 2023 were selected as the research objects. According to the random number table method, they were divided into the control group (50 cases) and the observation group (50 cases). The control group received routine nursing intervention methods, and the observation group received routine nursing +two-way quality feedback management method. The intervention effect, improvement of self-management ability, psychological state and sleep quality were compared between the two groups. Results Compared with the control group, the observation group had significant reductions in hemostasis time, length of hospital stay, hospitalization cost, Incidence of rebleeding during hospitalization, self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) score, self-rating depression scale (SDS) score, and SRSS score (P<0.05),while the liver cirrhosis self-management behavior scale score increased significantly (P<0.05). Conclusion Two-way quality feedback management has a significant intervention effect on liver cirrhosis patients with UGB, which can effectively improve the self-management ability of patients,improve their mental state and sleep quality, and shorten the rehabilitation process.

Key words: two-way quality feedback management, liver cirrhosis, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, quality of sleep

中图分类号:

R473

吕金宏. 双向质量反馈管理对肝硬化合并UGB的效果及对患者SRSS评分的影响[J]. 中华养生保健, 2024, 42(17): 109-112.

LYU Jin-hong. Effect of Two-way Quality Feedback Management on Liver Cirrhosis Complicated with UGB and Its Influence on SRSS Score of Patients[J]. ZHONGHUA YANGSHENG BAOJIAN, 2024, 42(17): 109-112.

参考文献

[1] YANG Z, LIU Z, LIU Q, et al.Research Progress in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Liver Cirrhosis[J].World Scientific Research Journal,2020,6(1):159-164.
[2] 杨美. 以奥马哈系统为基础行个案管理对肝硬化合并消化道出血患者临床结局、生活质量及心理状态的影响.国际护理学杂志2021,40(3):467-470.
[3] 薛晓艳,薛晓锐.双向质量反馈护理模式在老年食管癌患者术后的应用[J]. 黑龙江医药科学,2021,44(1):91-92.
[4] 中华医学会肝病学分会.肝硬化诊治指南[J].中华肝脏病杂志,2019,27(11):846-865.
[5] 武学敏. Rockall危险性积分导向下的分级护理对乙肝肝硬化合并上消化道出血患者再出血发生率及遵医行为的影响[J].黑龙江中医药,2022,51(4):268-270.
[6] 田银娣,王怡恺,李静,等.焦虑和抑郁量表在肝硬化患者临床应用中的信效度评价[J].实用肝脏病杂志,2019,22(1):105-108.
[7] 辛贺靖,杜莹.针对性护理干预对慢性乙型肝炎患者应对方式和睡眠质量的影响[J].世界睡眠医学杂志,2022,9(2):288-290.
[8] MANJUNATH F V, RANJITH K G K, PARAMESHWAR S, et al. Study of cardiac involvement in liver cirrhosis patients[J].International Journal of Advances in Medicine,2021,8(7):940.
[9] 叶茂. 双向质量反馈护理模式在肝硬化合并上消化道出血患者护理中的应用[J].罕少疾病杂志,2022,29(1):58-59,105.
[10] 王晔,陈颖,吉箐.护患双向质量反馈护理模式对女性恶性肿瘤患者中央静脉穿刺置管并发症的预防效果观察[J].中国性科学,2022,31(11):60-63.
[11] 倪华. 双向质量反馈模式护理联合按摩干预对顺产产妇产后尿潴留发生率、NRS评分及心理应激状态的影响[J].国际护理学杂志,2020,39(22):4112-4116.
[12] 程小娟,李冬梅,高德华.双向质量反馈护理对脊髓型颈椎病患者术后睡眠质量、自护能力和生活质量的影响[J].海南医学,2023,34(21):3157-3162.
[13] 迟春妹. 双向质量反馈护理模式在提高慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者治疗依从性中的护理分析[J].心理月刊,2020,15(11):117.
[14] 兴东梅. 双向质量反馈护理模式在慢阻肺中的护理效果研究[J].中国现代药物应用,2019,13(6):189-190.
[15] 张利苹. 双向质量反馈护理模式在慢阻肺中的护理中的效果评价[J].中外女性健康研究,2020(16):15-16,18.
[16] 肖乐尧,杨平,张莉,等.肝硬化病人睡眠障碍的研究进展[J].护理研究, 2023,37(4):630-634.
[17] 缪姗姗,张丽华,保雯雯.回授法健康教育对肝硬化患者疾病知识认知程度、自我管理能力及生活质量的影响[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2022,28(17):123-125.
[18] 吴颖文. 双向质量反馈模式护理干预对顺产产妇产后负性情绪及并发症发生率的影响分析[J].医药前沿,2021,11(26):142-143,146.