细节干预联合优质护理对脑血管意外后遗症患者生活质量、负面情绪的影响

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨针对脑血管意外后遗症患者,采用细节干预联合优质护理的效果。方法抽取2021年5月—2023年5月江苏省无锡市康复医院收治的80例脑血管意外后遗症患者作为研究对象,依据随机数表法将其分为干预组和对照组,各40例,其中对照组给予常规护理干预措施,干预组给予细节干预+优质护理干预,采用焦虑（SAS）和抑郁（SDS）自评量表评价患者的心理状态,采用SF-36量表评估患者治疗后的生活质量,比较两组患者护理满意度。结果护理前两组患者的SAS、SDS评分比较,差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）,护理干预后两组患者的SAS、SDS评分均降低,且干预组的SAS、SDS评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）;护理前两组患者的生理功能、生理职能、躯体疼痛、活力评分比较,差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）,干预后两组患者的生理功能、生理职能、躯体疼痛、活力评分均降低,且干预组的以上维度评分均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）;干预组护理满意度高于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论脑血管依赖后遗症,在治疗过程中联合细节干预、优质护理,可显著提高治疗的效果,帮助病人减轻负面情绪,提高生活水平,应用价值显著。

关键词: 细节干预, 优质护理, 脑血管意外后遗症, 生活质量, 负面情绪

Abstract: Objective To explore the effectiveness of detailed intervention combined with high-quality care for patients with sequelae of cerebrovascular accidents. Methods From May 2021 to May 2023, 80 patients with sequelae of cerebrovascular accidents admitted to Wuxi Rehabilitation Hospital were selected as the research subjects of this article. They were randomly divided into an intervention group and a control group based on their hospitalization number, with 40 patients in each group. The control group received routine nursing interventions, while the intervention group received detailed and high-quality nursing interventions, The psychological status of patients was evaluated using the Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and the Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS). The quality of life of patients after treatment was evaluated using the SF-36 scale, and nursing satisfaction was compared between the two groups of patients. Results There was no statistically difference in SAS and SDS scores between the two groups of patients before nursing (P>0.05). After nursing intervention, the SAS and SDS scores of both groups of patients decreased, and after nursing intervention, the SAS and SDS scores of the intervention group were lower than those of the control group (P<0.05); There was no statistically difference in physiological function, physiological function, physical pain, and vitality scores between the two groups of patients before nursing intervention (P>0.05). After nursing intervention, the physiological function, physical pain, and vitality scores of the two groups of patients decreased, and after nursing intervention, the scores of the intervention group in the above dimensions were higher than those of the control group (P<0.05); The nursing satisfaction of patients in the intervention group was 95.00%, while the nursing satisfaction of patients in the control group was 75.00%. The nursing satisfaction of patients in the intervention group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion The combination of detailed intervention and high-quality care during the treatment of sequelae of cerebrovascular dependence can significantly improve the treatment effect, help patients reduce negative emotions, improve their living standards, and have significant application value.

Key words: detail intervention, high quality care, sequela of cerebrovascular accidents, quality of life, negative emotions

中图分类号:

徐云. 细节干预联合优质护理对脑血管意外后遗症患者生活质量、负面情绪的影响[J]. 中华养生保健, 2024, 42(17): 106-108.

XU Yun. The Impact of Detailed Intervention Combined with High-Quality Nursing on the Quality of Life and Negative Emotions of Patients with Sequelae of Cerebrovascular Accidents[J]. ZHONGHUA YANGSHENG BAOJIAN, 2024, 42(17): 106-108.

参考文献

[1] 陈永刚,王红卫,许莹.利伐沙班对稳定性冠心病合并房颤患者临床疗效及脑血管意外事件发生率的影响研究[J].贵州医药,2021,45(5):759-761.
[2] 郭琳琳. 脑血管意外后遗症患者行中西医结合护理对生活质量的影响[J].实用中西医结合临床,2020,20(2):157-158.
[3] 李嫱,陈晓君,孟凡婷,等.杵针疗法联合情志干预对脑卒中后抑郁患者负面情绪、功能失调性状况及血清ApoH、AQP4表达的影响[J].四川中医,2023,41(1):187-190.
[4] 孙立宾,陈谷哮,冉娴静. 标准化健康宣教对脑血管支架成形术患者不良情绪、应激反应改善效果观察[J]. 重庆医学,2021,50(11):1817-1820,1825.
[5] 尤雪莲,梁晨,李杨.补阳还五汤联合芍药甘草汤加减治疗脑梗死后遗症对患者肢体运动功能恢复及生活质量的影响[J].四川中医,2022,40(12):130-133.
[6] 徐朝霞,董湘萍,景艳红,等.优质护理联合随访护理对癫痫患者康复、负面情绪及生活质量的影响研究[J].中国全科医学,2019(S02):202-205.
[7] 邓竹君,孙耀霞,聂路静,等.磁性管理联合心理干预对急性脑出血患者负面情绪及生活质量的影响[J].国际精神病学杂志,2020,47(1):181-184.
[8] 王凤颖,徐秀丽.协同护理联合心理干预对首发脑卒中患者自我护理能力和负面情绪、生存质量的影响[J].医学临床研究,2018,35(6):1072-1075.
[9] 殷宗莉,张维.优质化细节护理对颅内动脉瘤患者负面情绪及护理满意度的影响[J].山西医药杂志,2021,50(7):1198-1200.
[10] 张惠娜,朱琳怡,黄玲颖,等.中医特色延续性护理联合心理护理对上肢骨折创伤患者生活质量及情绪的影响[J].西部中医药,2023,36(4):118-121.
[11] 柏霞,潘力生,丁振.言语激励联合流程化健康宣教对下肢动脉硬化闭塞症患者负面情绪及生活质量的影响[J].西部中医药,2021,34(12):139-143.

[1]	王慧敏, 王怡佳. 标准化护理联合优质护理用于子宫肌瘤患者术后护理中的效果[J]. 中华养生保健, 2024, 42(9): 100-102.
[2]	何育红, 文小艳. 中医定向透药联合音乐护理对冠心病患者负面情绪及生活质量影响[J]. 中华养生保健, 2024, 42(9): 109-112.
[3]	杨海娜. 心理干预联合健康宣教对冠心病心绞痛患者治疗依从性、生活质量影响[J]. 中华养生保健, 2024, 42(9): 119-121.
[4]	孙艳. 老年周围血管疾病患者介入手术治疗中进行围术期优质护理对减少不良事件发生的作用[J]. 中华养生保健, 2024, 42(9): 138-141.
[5]	温海燕. 思维导图下的分阶段家庭访视护理对老年高血压患者QOL评分、MCMQ评分的影响[J]. 中华养生保健, 2024, 42(9): 144-147.
[6]	吕晓珊, 马晓睿. 认知干预联合SBAR沟通对妊娠高血压患者生活质量及负面情绪的影响[J]. 中华养生保健, 2024, 42(9): 150-153.
[7]	钟金侠. CICARE沟通方式对CHD患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后疾病不确定感、自我护理能力及生活质量的影响[J]. 中华养生保健, 2024, 42(8): 106-109.
[8]	陈美玲. 聚焦解决护理模式对结肠癌术后化疗患者癌因性疲乏和生活质量的影响[J]. 中华养生保健, 2024, 42(8): 134-137.
[9]	张艳清. 微信延续性护理联合院内精细化护理对急性心肌梗死患者生活质量的影响[J]. 中华养生保健, 2024, 42(8): 143-146.
[10]	杨欢, 周娟. 基于FTS的多模式护理联合心理干预对胃肠手术患者心理状态及康复效果的影响[J]. 中华养生保健, 2024, 42(8): 156-160.
[11]	秦倩, 张崇海. 红蓝光与粉刺挤压联合果酸换肤治疗中重度痤疮效果对比[J]. 中华养生保健, 2024, 42(8): 181-184.
[12]	王晓雯. 5A+5R护理模式结合渐进式饮食管理对消化性胃溃疡患者的影响[J]. 中华养生保健, 2024, 42(7): 81-84.
[13]	吕彦颖. 医护一体化查房结合AIDET沟通模式对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者康复及生活质量影响的研究[J]. 中华养生保健, 2024, 42(7): 90-93.
[14]	吴玉梅. 医护一体化快速康复外科护理对胸腔镜肺癌根治患者术后恢复的影响[J]. 中华养生保健, 2024, 42(7): 111-115.
[15]	张艳波. 早期预警护理干预在心力衰竭患者中的应用效果观察[J]. 中华养生保健, 2024, 42(7): 124-127.