改良外剥内扎联合弹力线套扎术治疗混合痔的临床研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的研究对混合痔患者实施改良外剥内扎联合弹力线套扎术治疗的疗效。方法选择2022年3月—2023年3月在临沂市中心医院接受治疗的76例混合痔患者作为研究对象,按患者入院先后顺序将其均分为A、B两组,每组38例。对A组实施传统外剥内扎术治疗,B组则进行改良外剥内扎联合弹力线套扎术治疗,比较A、B两组临床指标、主要症状评分、手术治疗效果以及术后并发症发生情况。结果 A组患者术中出血量大于B组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。A组患者手术时长、手术部位愈合时间、住院时间长于B组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。A组手术创面疼痛及肛缘水肿程度较B组更严重,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。两组患者手术治疗效果以及并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论对混合痔患者行改良外剥内扎联合弹力线套扎术能有效减少患者术中出血量,缩短手术所需时间,患者术后能更快恢复,且患者手术创面疼痛更弱,肛缘水肿程度更低。

关键词: 混合痔, 手术治疗, 手术疗效

Abstract: Objective To study the therapeutic effect of modified external stripping and internal ligation combined with elastic wire ligation on patients with mixed hemorrhoids. Methods The 76 mixed hemorrhoids patients treated in Linyi Central Hospital from March 2022 to March 2023 were selected as the study subjects. And they were divided into two groups according to the order of admission. According to the order of patients' admission, they were divided into two groups A and B. Group A underwent traditional external stripping and ligation, while Group B underwent modified external stripping and ligation combined with elastic line ligation. The clinical indicators, main symptom scores, surgical treatment effect and postoperative complications of groups A and B were compared. Results The intraoperative bleeding in group A was greater than that in group B, significant (P<0.05). Operation duration, healing time and hospital stay in Group A were longer than Group B (P<0.05). Surgical wound pain and anal margin edema were more severe in group A than in group B (P<0.05). No significant difference was found between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion The improved external stripping and internal ligation combined with elastic wire ligation for mixed hemorrhoids is highly safe and can achieve ideal treatment results.

Key words: mixed hemorrhoids, surgical treatment, surgical efficacy

中图分类号:

R657.18

马宁, 秦丽丽. 改良外剥内扎联合弹力线套扎术治疗混合痔的临床研究[J]. 中华养生保健, 2024, 42(14): 42-46.

MA Ning, QIN Li-li. Clinical Study on the Treatment of Mixed Hemorrhoids with Improved External Stripping and Internal Ligation Combined with Elastic Wire Ligation[J]. ZHONGHUA YANGSHENG BAOJIAN, 2024, 42(14): 42-46.

参考文献

[1] 梁桃军,李海旭,董升云.弹力线套扎术结合改良外剥内扎术治疗环状混合痔的临床疗效分析[J].系统医学,2021,6(18):94-96,103.
[2] 杨云,史振滏,赵岚,等.外剥内扎联合弹力线套扎术治疗女性环状混合痔的临床观察[J].宁夏医学杂志,2021,43(11):1024-1025.
[3] 叶斌,李创.自动弹力线痔疮套扎术联合外剥内扎术治疗混合痔对患者肛管功能的影响[J].现代医学与健康研究(电子版),2022,6(13):1-4.
[4] 梁伟兵,周美芳,黄锦辉,等.润肠汤联合痔愈洗剂治疗混合痔套扎器改良内扎内注术后并发症的临床研究[J].中国当代医药,2021,28(3):13-16.
[5] 彭云花,杨巍,陈天,等.健脾益气法联合弹力线内套外剥术治疗老年脱垂型混合痔临床疗效观察[J].辽宁中医药大学学报,2020,22(12):82-85.
[6] 高红梅,何燕平.自动弹力线痔疮套扎术联合外剥内扎术对重度环状混合痔的疗效分析[J].贵州医药,2023,47(7):1093-1094.
[7] 刘安,李磊磊,李雪琦,等.弹力线套扎+硬化剂注射+外剥内扎术治疗混合痔的临床疗效观察[J].结直肠肛门外科,2021,27(6):572-575.
[8] 洪子夫,冯丽鹏,何颖华,等.改良外剥内扎楔形切除整形术加消痔灵注射术治疗环状混合痔临床研究[J].中国临床医生杂志,2023,51(2):225-227.
[9] 许韵,严满红,袁保.改良吻合器痔上黏膜环切术与痔自动套扎术联合外剥内扎术治疗中重度混合痔老年患者的疗效[J].临床与病理杂志,2022,42(3):696-701.
[10] 张杰,刘艳.弹力线套扎联合外剥内扎术治疗重度混合痔术后并发肛周脓肿1例报告[J].现代养生,2023,23(3):237-238.
[11] 王心吉,张保田,曾卫平,等.探讨外剥内扎术和自动痔疮套扎术治疗环状混合痔的临床疗效对比[J].医学理论与实践,2021,34(14):2462-2464.
[12] 王环,陈战斌,李海玲.自动痔疮套扎术(RPH)联合外剥内扎术治疗混合痔的效果与安全性分析[J].新疆医学,2022,52(1):43-45.
[13] 王青,葛磊,管俊杰.RPH联合外剥内扎术与PPH治疗重度混合痔的临床效果[J].深圳中西医结合杂志,2021,31(11):152-154.
[14] 覃天赐,梁武新,韦治远,等.自动弹力线痔疮套扎器双层套扎联合外痔切除术治疗混合痔的临床疗效观察[J].大医生,2022,7(14):46-48.
[15] 宋俊,黄艳梅,贺婷,等.自动弹力线套扎术联合细针穿刺电凝在治疗静脉曲张型混合痔中的临床研究[J].江西医药,2021,56(9):1381-1384.
[16] 柴仲秋,张俊仲,周冰.弹力线套扎术联合剥扎疗法治疗混合痔的临床应用进展和疗效分析[J].中国医疗器械信息,2021,27(10):13-15,33.
[17] 裴艳秋. 自动弹力线痔套扎术治疗Ⅲ~Ⅳ度混合痔并直肠黏膜脱垂的临床效果分析[J].河南外科学杂志,2022,28(3):147-149.
[18] 缪春山,张艳秋.自动弹力线套扎联合外痔切除术治疗混合痔的临床观察[J].临床普外科电子杂志,2022,10(4):27-30.
[19] 兰波,丁新民,何耀彬,等.混合痔采用自动弹力线痔疮套扎器联合超声刀手术治疗的临床分析[J].中外医学研究,2021,19(14):145-147.
[20] 庄华玲,李镇伟,陈为才.吻合器痔上黏膜环切术联合外剥内扎术对混合痔患者手术相关指标及肛门功能的影响[J].基层医学论坛,2023,27(19):76-78.