双向等压引流术与低位切开高位挂线治疗复杂性肛瘘疗效比较

中华养生保健 ›› 2024, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (11): 175-178.

双向等压引流术与低位切开高位挂线治疗复杂性肛瘘疗效比较

张强, 谢彦春^*

榆林市榆阳区中医医院普通外科,陕西榆林,719000

出版日期:2024-06-01 发布日期:2024-05-22
通讯作者: ^*谢彦春,E-mail：984681172@qq.com。
作者简介:张强（1987—）,男,汉族,籍贯：陕西省榆林市,硕士研究生,主治医师,研究方向：肛肠手术。

Comparison of Therapeutic Effects Between Bidirectional Isobaric Drainage and Low Incision and High Thread Hanging in the Treatment of Complex Anal Fistula

ZHANG Qiang, XIE Yan-chun^*

General Surgery, Yulin Yuyang District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shaanxi Yulin 719000, China

Online:2024-06-01 Published:2024-05-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的比较双向等压引流术与低位切开高位挂线治疗复杂性肛瘘的疗效。方法选择2019年1月—2022年12月榆林市榆阳区中医医院治疗的70例复杂性肛瘘患者作为研究对象,根据患者治疗术式不同将其分为试验组和常规组,每组35例。试验组采取双向等压引流术治疗,常规组采取低位切开高位挂线治疗,比较两组患者治疗效果、创面愈合时间、术后1 d、3 d、7 d肛门疼痛情况、术前及术后5 d、1月、3月肛门功能情况。结果两组治疗效果比较,差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。试验组患者术后住院时长及创面愈合时长均短于常规组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。术后1 d、3 d、7 d,两组患者疼痛评分均逐渐下降,试验组各时间点评分均低于常规组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。术后5 d,两组Wexner评分均上升,术后1月、3月随时间推移评分逐渐下降,组间比较,试验组在术后5 d、1月、3月评分均低于常规组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论双向等压引流术与低位切开高位挂线治疗复杂性肛瘘疗效相当,但双向等压引流术造成疼痛更低,愈合时间更短,且会有效保护肛门括约肌功能,防止肛门失禁的发生。

关键词: 双向等压引流术, 低位切开高位挂线, 复杂性肛瘘, Wexner评分

Abstract: Objective To compare the efficacy of bidirectional isobaric drainage and low incision and high thread-drawing in the treatment of complex anal fistula. Methods From January 2019 to December 2022, 70 patients with complex anal fistula treated in Yuyang District Hospital of Yulin City were selected as the research object,according to the different treatment methods of patients, they were divided into experimental group and conventional group, with 35 patients in each group. The experimental group adopted bidirectional isobaric drainage treatment, the conventional group adopted low incision and high hanging line treatment.The treatment effect, wound healing time, anal pain, 1 d, 3 d, 7 d, and anal function, 5 d, 1 and 3 month were compared between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference between the experimental group and the routine group (P>0.05). The length of postoperative hospital stay and wound healing in the experimental group were shorter than those in the routine group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). On the 1st, 3rd and 7th day after operation, the VAS scores of patients in the two groups decreased gradually, and the scores in the experimental group were lower than those in the routine group, with statistical significance (P<0.05). On 5th postoperative day, the scores of Wexner in both groups increased, and gradually decreased in January and March after operation. Compared between groups, the scores in the experimental group were lower than those in the routine group on 5th postoperative day, January and March, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion Bi-directional isobaric drainage is as effective as low incision and high thread-drawing in the treatment of complex anal fistula, but it causes lower pain and faster healing time, and can effectively protect the function of anal sphincter and prevent anal incontinence.

Key words: bidirectional isobaric drainage, low cut and high thread hanging, complex anal fistula, wexner

中图分类号:

R657.1+6

张强, 谢彦春. 双向等压引流术与低位切开高位挂线治疗复杂性肛瘘疗效比较[J]. 中华养生保健, 2024, 42(11): 175-178.

ZHANG Qiang, XIE Yan-chun. Comparison of Therapeutic Effects Between Bidirectional Isobaric Drainage and Low Incision and High Thread Hanging in the Treatment of Complex Anal Fistula[J]. ZHONGHUA YANGSHENG BAOJIAN, 2024, 42(11): 175-178.

参考文献

[1] IQBAL N, DILKE S M, GELDOF J, et al.Is fistulotomy with immediate sphincter reconstruction (FISR) a sphincter preserving procedure for high anal fistula? A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2021,23(12):3073-3089.
[2] 杨铁军,张婷,吕文佳.肛瘘精准微创术与传统肛瘘切开挂线引流术治疗肛瘘的近远期疗效比较[J].中国医药,2020,15(5):753-757.
[3] 孟庆超. 双向等压引流根治术对高位单纯性肛瘘患者疼痛程度及生活质量的影响[J].医学理论与实践,2020,33(16):2686-2687.
[4] 刘娣. 双向等压引流术在高位肛瘘治疗中的应用效果[J].中国肛肠病杂志,2022,42(6):28-29.
[5] 王天宝,王锡山,傅传刚,等.结直肛肠门疾病临床实践指南[M].广东:广东科技出版社,2016:453-455.
[6] 刘越军,孙英杰,张健,等.减/低压松弛挂线引流根治术治疗高位肛瘘的疗效观察[J].中国煤炭工业医学杂志,2020,23(5):492-495.
[7] 马凰富,李佳楠,来丽霞,等.高位肛瘘双向等压引流根治术的操作要求及思考[J].环球中医药,2019,12(2):252-255.
[8] 童拥军,范慰隆,徐鹏,等.减(低)压引流根治术治疗高位肛瘘的临床效果[J].临床合理用药杂志,2020,13(29):146-147.
[9] 张丹,姜宁宁.双向等压引流根治术治疗高位肛瘘患者的临床效果[J].临床医学研究与实践,2021,6(33):81-83.
[10] 朱争艳. 主管切开挂线支管对口引流术对高位复杂肛瘘的疗效[J].中国现代普通外科进展,2020,23(5):388-390.
[11] 曹霞,殷凯,邱榕,等.中医挂线联合对口引流疗法治疗高位肛瘘的疗效及对疼痛应激反应、肛门括约肌功能的影响[J].中国中医急症,2022,31(1):126-129.
[12] 赵长刚. 切开挂线对口引流术治疗高位复杂性肛瘘的临床疗效[J].中国医药指南,2021,19(36):85-86.
[13] 于建云,吴秀丽,孙宏普.黄柏苦参汤坐浴熏洗联合挂线疗法对肛瘘患者术后创面疼痛及愈合程度的影响[J].河南中医,2022,42(12):1872-1875.
[14] 强洁梅,邓代朋,麻金波.低位切开留皮桥高位挂线术治疗高位复杂性肛瘘的临床分析[J].贵州医药,2022,46(10):1552-1554.
[15] 李晓辉. 低位挂线高位扩创引流术治疗高位复杂性肛瘘的应用体会[J].河南外科学杂志,2020,26(3):61-62.
[16] 张雪奇. 主灶切开对口引流高位胶管引流术对高位复杂性肛瘘患者术后肛门功能及复发率的影响[J].临床研究,2021,29(1):41-42.