经皮神经电刺激联合胸椎旁神经阻滞对胸腔镜肺癌根治术术后疼痛和睡眠质量的影响

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨经皮神经电刺激联合胸椎旁神经阻滞对胸腔镜肺癌根治术患者术后疼痛和睡眠质量的影响。方法选取2020年1月—2022年6月江苏省徐州市中医院收治的120例胸腔镜肺癌根治术患者,按照随机数表法将其分为对照组和试验组,各60例。对照组采取胸椎旁神经阻滞,试验组采取经皮神经电刺激联合胸椎旁神经阻滞。采用数字分级评分法（NRS）评估两组术后静息和活动性疼痛,记录术后补救镇痛发生情况,采用匹兹堡睡眠质量指数（PSQI）评估术后1 d、2 d、3 d的睡眠质量。结果两组术后4 h、8 h、12 h、72 h的静息NRS评分比较,差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）,试验组术后24 h、48 h的静息NRS评分明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）;两组术后4 h、8 h、12 h、24 h、48 h的活动性NRS评分比较,差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）,试验组术后72 h的活动性NRS评分明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。试验组术后2 d的补救镇痛率明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）,两组术后1 d、3 d的补救镇痛率比较,差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。试验组术后1 d、2 d的PSQI评分明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）,两组术后3 d的PSQI评分比较,差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论与单纯胸椎旁神经阻滞相比,联合经皮神经电刺激对活动性疼痛的改善有限,但可有效减轻静息性疼痛,减少补救镇痛情况的发生,并降低PSQI评分。

关键词: 经皮神经电刺激, 胸椎旁神经阻滞, 术后疼痛, 睡眠质量, 胸腔镜肺癌根治术

Abstract: Objective To investigate the effect of transcutaneous nerve stimulation combined with thoracic paravertebral nerve block on pain and sleep quality after thoracoscopic radical resection of lung cancer. Methods From January 2020 to June 2022, 120 patients with thoracoscopic radical resection of lung cancer were randomly divided into two groups, 60 patients in each group. The control group was treated with thoracic paravertebral nerve block, and the experimental group was treated with transcutaneous nerve stimulation combined with thoracic paravertebral nerve block. NRS was used to evaluate the rest and active pain after operation in the two groups, and the occurrence of postoperative relief analgesia was recorded. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) was used to evaluate the sleep quality on the 1st, 2nd and 3rd day after operation. Results The NRS score of resting pain at 24 h and 48 h after operation in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05), while the NRS score of resting pain at 4 h, 8 h, 12 h and 72 h after operation in the two groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The NRS score of active pain in the two groups at 4 h, 8 h, 12 h, 24 h and 48 h after operation was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The NRS score of active pain in the experimental group at 72 h after operation was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). The rescue analgesia rate in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in the rescue analgesia rate between the two groups on the first and third day after operation (P>0.05). The PSQI scores of the experimental group on the 1st and 2nd day after operation were significantly lower than those of the control group (P<0.05), and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups on the 3rd day after operation (P>0.05). Conclusion Compared with simple thoracic paravertebral nerve block, combined with percutaneous nerve electrical stimulation has limited improvement on active pain, but it can effectively relieve resting pain, reduce relief pain, and reduce PSQI score.

Key words: percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, thoracic paravertebral nerve block, postoperative pain, sleep quality, thoracoscopic radical resection of lung cancer

中图分类号:

R614

崔玉沛, 冯秀梅, 刘静. 经皮神经电刺激联合胸椎旁神经阻滞对胸腔镜肺癌根治术术后疼痛和睡眠质量的影响[J]. 中华养生保健, 2023, 41(15): 174-177.

CUI Yu-pei, FENG Xiu-mei, LIU Jing. Effect of Transcutaneous Nerve Stimulation Combined with Thoracic Paravertebral Nerve Block on Pain and Sleep Quality after Thoracoscopic Radical Resection of Lung Cancer[J]. ZHONGHUA YANGSHENG BAOJIAN, 2023, 41(15): 174-177.

参考文献

[1] 邱迪,王星明,刘清仁,等.急性术后疼痛危险因素和疼痛程度预测方法的研究进展[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2022,38(2):194-198.
[2] LEE J E, ANDERSON C M, PERKHOUNKOVA Y, et al.Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation reduces resting pain in head and neck cancer patients: A randomized and placebo-controlled double-blind pilot study[J]. Cancer Nurs,2019,42(3):218-228.
[3] 何丽华,龙新安,施娟娟,等.经皮神经电刺激治疗胰腺癌疼痛的效果观察[J].广东医学,2019,40(13):1904-1907.
[4] BUYSSE D J,REYNOLDS C F III,MONK T H,et al. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index:A new instrument for psychiatric practice and research[J]. Psychiatry Res,1989,28(2):193-213.
[5] 路桃影,李艳,夏萍,等.匹兹堡睡眠质量指数的信度及效度分析[J].重庆医学,2014,43(3):260-263.
[6] WANG J J, XIE Y, ZHAO H L, et al.Transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation over acupoints for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Medicine (Baltimore),2018,97(25):e11199.
[7] DIAS L V, CORDEIRO M A, SCHMIDT DE SALES R, et al. Immediate analgesic effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and interferential current (IFC) on chronic low back pain: Randomised placebo-controlled trial[J]. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies,2021,27:181-190.
[8] DE OLIVEIRA H U, DOS SANTOS R S, MALTA I H S, et al. Investigation of the involvement of the endocannabinoid system in TENS-induced antinociception[J]. J Pain,2020,21(7-8):820-835.
[9] 端木程琳,张晓宁,何伟,等.电针/经皮电刺激激活不同传入神经纤维对肌肉炎性痛大鼠的镇痛效应研究[J].针刺研究,2021,46(5):404-410.
[10] ZHU Y, FENG Y, PENG L.Effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for pain control after total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Rehabil Med,2017,49(9):700-704.
[11] RAMANATHAN D, SALEH A, KLIKA A K, et al.The use of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation after total knee arthroplasty: A prospective randomized controlled trial[J]. Surg Technol Int,2017,30:425-434.
[12] JAHANGIRIFARD A, RAZAVI M, AHMADI Z H, et al.Effect of TENS on postoperative pain and pulmonary function in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery[J]. Pain Manag Nurs,2018,19(4):408-414.
[13] 朱云柯,林琳,廖虎,等.中国胸外科围手术期疼痛管理专家共识(2018版)[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2018,25(11):7-14.
[14] 周据津,李陈茜,李冰,等.胸椎旁神经阻滞联合全身麻醉对胸腔镜肺癌根治术老年患者术后脑损伤的影响[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2022,42(1):34-38.
[15] 吕婧,欧国昆,马化鑫,等.胸椎旁神经阻滞对肺癌患者胸腔镜手术后肿瘤标志物、疼痛评估及预后的影响[J].沈阳药科大学学报,2021,38(S2):12-1214.