带线锚钉与可吸收缝线重建喙锁韧带联合锁骨钩钢板治疗陈旧性肩锁关节脱位的临床疗效

中华养生保健 ›› 2022, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (22): 18-21.

带线锚钉与可吸收缝线重建喙锁韧带联合锁骨钩钢板治疗陈旧性肩锁关节脱位的临床疗效

刘金海

武威市人民医院创伤中心,甘肃武威,733000

出版日期:2022-11-16 发布日期:2022-11-15
作者简介:刘金海（1983.11-）,男,汉族,籍贯：甘肃省武威市,本科,主治医师,研究方向：四肢创伤,手足显微外科。
基金资助:
武威市科技计划项目（ww2002096）

Clinical Effect of Reconstruction of Coracoclavicular Ligament with Suture Anchor and Absorbable Suture Combined with Clavicular Hook Plate in the Treatment of Old Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation

LIU Jin-hai

Wuwei People’s Hospital Trauma Center, Wuwei Gansu, 733000, China

Online:2022-11-16 Published:2022-11-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨带线锚钉与可吸收缝线重建喙锁韧带联合锁骨钩钢板治疗陈旧性肩锁关节脱位的临床疗效。方法采用回顾性研究,选择2020年10月~2022年2月武威市人民医院收治的陈旧性肩锁关节脱位患者60例,按照内固定方式不同分为观察组（喙锁韧带重建联合锁骨钩钢板）和对照组（单纯肩锁关节清理固定术）,各30例。对比两组手术疗效、手术时间及术后恢复情况、术后3个月肩关节功能Constant-Murley评分、视觉模拟评分（VAS评分）、喙锁间距（CCD）和肩锁间隙（ACD）。结果观察组优良率96.67%（29/30）显著高于对照组73.33%（22/30）,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。观察组手术时间长于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。观察组骨折愈合时间、关节活动恢复时间和并发症发生率均显著少于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。观察组Constant-Murley评分显著大于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。观察组VAS评分显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。两组CCD和ACD比较,差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论带线锚钉与可吸收缝线重建喙锁韧带联合锁骨钩钢板治疗陈旧性肩锁关节脱位效果显著,可有效促进骨折愈合、尽早恢复肩关节功能,减轻疼痛,且并发症少,值得临床应用。

关键词: 陈旧性肩锁关节脱位, 带线锚钉, 可吸收缝线, 喙锁韧带, 锁骨钩钢板

Abstract: Objective To investigate the clinical effect of reconstruction of coracoclavicular ligament with suture anchor and absorbable suture combined with clavicular hook plate in the treatment of old acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Methods A retrospective study was adopted, a total of 60 patients with old acromioclavicular joint dislocation who were admitted to Wuwei People’s Hospital from October 2020 to February 2022 were selected and divided into observation group (coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction combined with clavicle hook plate) and control group ( Simple acromioclavicular joint debridement and fixation) 30 cases in each group. The operative efficacy, operative time, postoperative recovery, Constant-Murley score of shoulder joint function, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, coracoclavicular distance (CCD) and acromioclavicular space (ACD) were compared between the two groups. Results The excellent and good rate of the observation group was 96.67% (29/30), which was significantly higher than that of the control group, 73.33% (22/30), the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The operation time of the observation group was longer than that of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The Constant-Murley score of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The VAS score was significantly lower than that of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no difference in CCD and ACD between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion The reconstruction of coracoclavicular ligament with suture anchor and absorbable suture combined with clavicular hook plate is effective in the treatment of old acromioclavicular joint dislocation. It can effectively promote fracture healing, restore shoulder function as soon as possible, reduce pain, and have fewer complications, which is worthy of clinical application.

Key words: old acromioclavicular dislocation, suture anchor, absorbable suture, coracoclavicular ligament, clavicular hook plate

中图分类号:

R687.3

刘金海. 带线锚钉与可吸收缝线重建喙锁韧带联合锁骨钩钢板治疗陈旧性肩锁关节脱位的临床疗效[J]. 中华养生保健, 2022, 40(22): 18-21.

LIU Jin-hai. Clinical Effect of Reconstruction of Coracoclavicular Ligament with Suture Anchor and Absorbable Suture Combined with Clavicular Hook Plate in the Treatment of Old Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation[J]. ZHONGHUA YANGSHENG BAOJIAN, 2022, 40(22): 18-21.

参考文献

[1] 赵玺玖,蒋佳,赵金忠.肩锁关节脱位治疗研究进展[J].国际骨科学杂志,2022,43(1):36-40.
[2] 黄博轩,杨明,陈建海,等.肩锁关节脱位水平方向不稳定的研究进展[J].中华肩肘外科电子杂志,2020,8(4):372-375.
[3] 张磊,张华强,金玉峰,等.基于MRI喙锁韧带的解剖学参数分析[J].中国临床解剖学杂志,2022,40(3):259-262.
[4] 方亮,黎键,赵剑锋.关节镜异体肌腱重建喙锁韧带治疗肩锁关节脱位临床分析[J].浙江创伤外科,2021,26(5):855-857.
[5] 林宇生,欧阳建安,黄娜,等.不同手术方式治疗陈旧性肩锁关节脱位的疗效研究[J].中国医药科学,2019,9(19):226-229.
[6] Paul B, James C, Eugene T.Surgical management of chronic high-grade acromioclavicular joint dislocations:a systematic review[J].J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2019,28(10):1-8.
[7] 郑兴国,薛骋,李翔,等.喙锁韧带解剖重建与钩钢板治疗锁骨远端NeerⅡb型骨折的疗效比较[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2022,24(5):421-428.
[8] 吴铭洲,周永其,朱伟.锁骨钩钢板联合喙肩韧带转位重建喙锁韧带与单纯锁骨钩钢板治疗肩锁关节脱位的疗效比较[J].中国实用医药,2022,17(10):16-19.
[9] 宋道正. 锁骨钩钢板内固定治疗锁骨远端骨折及肩锁关节脱位[J].河南外科学杂志,2020,26(3):136-137.
[10] Constant C R, Murley A H.A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder[J].Clin Orthop Relat Res,1987,214:160-164.
[11] 王治洲,张海龙,陈舰,等.肩锁关节及关节盘的相关解剖学特征[J].中国组织工程研究,2020,24(33):5358-5365.
[12] 潘勇泉,尚平,王庆,等.韧带重建与钩钢板治疗肩锁关节脱位效果分析[J].创伤外科杂志,2020,22(10):776-779.
[13] 邢进峰. 重视肩锁关节复合体修复以提高不稳定肩锁关节脱位疗效[J].中国骨伤,2020,33(8):693-695.
[14] 李树明,刘申,李青松,等.缝合锚并同种异体肌腱重建喙锁韧带治疗陈旧性Rockwood Ⅲ型肩锁关节脱位[J].实用骨科杂志,2020, 26(5):443-446.
[15] 燕飞,金泽鉴.自制实用新型专利工具在肩锁关节脱位合并喙锁韧带损伤治疗中的设计与应用[J].赤峰学院学报(自然科学版),2022,38(5):20-23.
[16] 祁志轶,胡杰亮,周保军,等.微创改良双纽扣型金属接骨板结合高强度纤维修复喙锁韧带治疗肩锁关节脱位合并喙锁韧带撕裂的临床研究[J].现代生物医学进展,2022,22(6):1079-1083,1092.
[17] Haber D B, Golijanin P, Stone G L, et al.Primary acromioclavicular coracoclavicular reconstruction using 2 allografts,tightrope, and stabilization to the acromion[J].Arthrosc Tech,2019,8(2):e147-e152.
[18] 张胤,庄澄宇,叶庭均,等.肩锁关节脱位患者的襻钢板固定与锁骨钩钢板固定治疗的长期随访对比[J].中国骨与关节杂志,2019, 8(8):567-572.
[19] 陆向君,徐刚,孟非凡,等.三种内固定方式治疗NeerⅡB型锁骨远端骨折的疗效比较[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2022,37(5):529-531.
[20] 陶日东,张新伟,黑金璇,等.克氏针固定联合喙锁韧带修复治疗急性肩锁脱位[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2021,29(8):704-708.