欢迎您访问《中华养生保健》官方网站!

中华养生保健 ›› 2022, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (22): 158-160.

• 经验交流 • 上一篇    下一篇

超声引导下穿刺引流治疗脊柱术区血肿的临床疗效研究

于湖1,2, 段小艺1,*   

  1. 1.西安交通大学第一附属医院PET-CT科,陕西 西安,710061;
    2.西安兵器工业五二一医院超声科,陕西 西安,710065
  • 出版日期:2022-11-16 发布日期:2022-11-15
  • 通讯作者: *段小艺,E-mail:duanxy@mail.xjtu.edu.cn。
  • 作者简介:于湖(1979.12-),男,汉族,籍贯:山西省临汾市,硕士研究生在读,副主任医师,研究方向:超声诊断及超声介入。

Clinical Study of Ultrasound-Guided Puncture and Drainage in the Treatment of Spinal Hematoma

YU Hu1,2, DUAN Xiao-yi1,*   

  1. 1. The Department of PET-CT, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an Shaanxi, 710061,China;
    2. The Department of Ultrasound,the 521 Hospital of Xi’an Ordnance Industry, Xi’an Shaanxi, 710065,China
  • Online:2022-11-16 Published:2022-11-15

摘要: 目的 回顾性探讨超声引导下穿刺引流对治疗脊柱术区血肿的临床疗效。方法 选择2020年1月~2022年7月西安兵器工业五二一医院收治的164例脊柱手术后术区发生血肿的患者为研究对象,对临床治疗方式进行回顾性分析,按照治疗方式分为超声下穿刺引流组(25例)、盲穿引流组(37例)和保守治疗组(102例)。手术后比较分析3组患者治疗有效率、术后住院天数、症状持续时间。结果 术后第1天、第5天超声下穿刺引流组、盲穿引流组患者的有效率明显高于保守治疗组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);超声下穿刺引流组、盲穿引流组患者术后住院天数、症状持续时间均显著低于保守治疗组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);超声下穿刺引流组与盲穿引流组的有效率、术后住院天数、症状持续时间相比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 超声引导下穿刺引流术具有安全、微创、有效等优点,且疗效显著高于保守治疗,是脊柱术后血肿治疗的首选方法。

关键词: 脊柱, 术区血肿, 超声, 穿刺引流, 临床疗效

Abstract: Objective To investigate the clinical effect of ultrasound-guided puncture and drainage on spinal hematoma. Methods 164 cases of hematoma in the operative area after spinal surgery admitted to Xi ‘an 521 Hospital of Ordnance Industry from January 2020 to July 2022 were selected as the research objects. The clinical treatment methods were retrospectively analyzed. According to the treatment methods, the patients were divided into ultrasound guided drainage group (n=25), blind perforation drainage group (n=37) and conservative treatment group (n=102). The effective rate, postoperative hospital stay and symptom duration of the three groups were compared and analyzed after operation. Results On the 1st and 5th day after operation, the effective rate of patients in ultrasound puncture and drainage group and blind puncture and drainage group was significantly higher than that in conservative treatment group (P<0.05). The postoperative hospital stay and symptom duration of patients in ultrasound puncture drainage group and blind puncture drainage group were significantly lower than those in conservative treatment group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the effective rate, postoperative hospital stay and symptom duration between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Ultrasound guided puncture and drainage is safe, minimally invasive and effective, meanwhile the curative effect is significantly higher than that of conservative treatment. It is the first choice for the treatment of spinal hematoma after spinal surgery.

Key words: spine, surgical area of hematoma, ultrasound, puncture and drainage, clinical efficacy

中图分类号: