并行采集技术在乳腺MR动态增强的临床应用

中华养生保健 ›› 2022, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (22): 143-145.

并行采集技术在乳腺MR动态增强的临床应用

肖莹¹, 许铧文², 徐婧婧², 李仰康^1,*

1.汕头大学医学院附属肿瘤医院放射科,广东汕头,515041;
2.汕头大学医学院附属肿瘤医院医疗质量管理科,广东汕头,515041

出版日期:2022-11-16 发布日期:2022-11-15
通讯作者: ^*李仰康,E-mail：308968123@qq.com。
作者简介:肖莹（1988.10-）,女,汉族,籍贯：广东省汕头市,本科,主管技师,研究方向：MR技术。

Clinical Application of Parallel Acquisition Technique in Dynamic Enhancement of Breast MR

XIAO Ying¹, XU Hua-wen², XU Jing-jing², LI Yang-kang^1,*

1. Department of Radiology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou Guangdong, 515041, China;
2. Mdical Quality Management Section, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou Guangdong, 515041, China

Online:2022-11-16 Published:2022-11-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的基于3.0T MR平台,探讨并行采集技术在GE乳腺动态增强（VIBRANT）中的应用。方法前瞻性选取2020年1月~2020年12月在汕头大学医学院附属肿瘤医院行MR动态增强扫描的70例乳腺癌患者,均为女性,所有患者均使用并行采集技术的动态增强扫描和不使用并行采集技术的动态增强扫描检查。计算两种检查方法的扫描时间、图像的空间分辨力、信噪比和对比度并进行统计学分析,比较两种检查方法动态增强MR使用并行采集技术和不使用并行采集技术的扫描时间、图像质量、诊断效能敏感性、特异性和准确性。结果 VIBRANT乳腺动态增强扫描中,使用并行采集技术扫描时间较不使用并行采集技术明显缩短（P<0.05）。两种检查方法的图像空间分辨力相同。两种检查方法图像的信噪比和对比度比较,差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。以病理学诊断为金标准,两种检查方法动态增强MRI对病灶诊断的敏感性、特异性、精确度和负预测性比较,差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。两种检查方法均与乳腺癌病理学诊断具有高度一致性。结论基于并行采集技术的VIBRANT乳腺动态增强扫描序列具有良好的诊断敏感性、特异性和准确性,在显著缩短扫描时间的前提下并不影响其诊断效能。

关键词: 磁共振成像, 动态增强扫描, 并行采集技术

Abstract: Objective To explore the application of parallel acquisition technology in GE breast dynamic enhancement (VIBRANT) technology based on 3.0TMR platform. Methods 70 patients with breast cancer who underwent MR dynamic contrast-enhanced scanning from January 2020 to December 2020 in the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College were selected prospectively, all of whom were female. All patients were examined by dynamic enhanced scanning with parallel acquisition technology and dynamic enhanced scanning without parallel acquisition technology. The scanning time, spatial resolution, signal-to-noise ratio and contrast of the two methods were calculated and compared statistically. The scan time, image quality, diagnostic performance sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the two methods of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR with and without the ARC technique were compared. Results In VIBRANT breast dynamic enhancement scan, the scanning time with parallel acquisition technology technology was significantly shorter than that without parallel acquisition technology technology (P<0.05). The spatial resolution of the two inspection methods was the same. There was no significant difference in signal-to-noise ratio and contrast between the two methods (P>0.05). Taking pathological diagnosis as the gold standard, there was no significant difference in the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and negative predictive value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI between the two methods (P>0.05). Two methods were highly consistent with pathological diagnosis of breast cancer. Conclusion VIBRANT dynamic enhanced breast scan sequence based on parallel acquisition technology has good diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy, and does not affect its diagnostic efficiency on the premise of significantly shortening the scanning time.

Key words: magnetic resonance imaging, dynamic enhanced scanning, parallel acquisition technology

中图分类号:

R814.4

肖莹, 许铧文, 徐婧婧, 李仰康. 并行采集技术在乳腺MR动态增强的临床应用[J]. 中华养生保健, 2022, 40(22): 143-145.

XIAO Ying, XU Hua-wen, XU Jing-jing, LI Yang-kang. Clinical Application of Parallel Acquisition Technique in Dynamic Enhancement of Breast MR[J]. ZHONGHUA YANGSHENG BAOJIAN, 2022, 40(22): 143-145.

参考文献

[1] 高婧,毛宁,谢海柱.基于医学图像的影像组学和深度学习在乳腺癌淋巴结转移预测中的研究进展[J].中华放射学杂志,2022,56(5):583-586.
[2] 李沉鲛,张雪琴,樊敏,等.MRI动态增强扫描联合DWI序列对女性乳腺疾病性质鉴别诊断价值研究[J].中国CT和MRI杂志,2022, 20(6):46-48.
[3] 肖莹. 乳腺MR动态增强扫描成像技术及临床应用研究[D].汕头大学,2021.
[4] 中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会.中国抗癌协会乳腺癌诊治指南与规范(2021年版)[J].中国癌症杂志,2021,31(10):954-1040.
[5] American College of Radiology (ACR).ACR BI-RADS-Ultrasound// ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System,Breast Imaging Atlas[Z].Reston:American College of Radiology,2003.
[6] 韩林梅,俞琴.并行采集技术在1.5T 8通道相控阵线圈头颅3D TOF MRA中的优化:体模研究[J].中国医学影像技术,2019,35(3):423-427.
[7] Del Grande F, Rashidi A, Luna R, et al.Five -Minute Five -Sequence Knee MRI Using CombinedSimultaneous Multislice and Parallel Imaging Acceleration: Comparison with 10-Minute Parallel Imaging Knee MRI[J]. Radiology,2021,299(3):635-646.
[8] 李铭,刘娇,周小燕,等.MR并行采集技术对BOLD序列信噪比的影响[J].中国现代医生,2020,58(29):129-132.
[9] 张家祥. 并行采集技术在上腹部磁共振成像检查中的应用[J].实用医学影像杂志,2021,22(2):181-182.
[10] 高家红,雷皓,陈群,等.磁共振成像发展综述[J].中国科学:生命科学,2020,50(11):1285-1295.
[11] 柳洋. 多血管床亚临床粥样硬化斑块特征与脑白质病变相关性的磁共振成像研究[D].扬州:扬州大学,2019.
[12] Ohlmeyer S, Laun F B, Palm T, et al.Simultaneous multislice echo planar imaging for accelerated diffusion-weighted imaging of malignant and benign breast lesions[J]. Invest Radiol,2019,54(8):524-530.
[13] 李胜春,唐盟,周云森,等.基于K空间理论的磁共振图像空间分辨率影响因素分析[J].工业计量,2022,32(2):21-24,47.
[14] 孙岩,邹月芬,郝跃峰,等.磁共振BLADE序列与小FOV表面线圈在距骨软骨成像中的应用[J].临床放射学杂志,2020,39(3):560-565.
[15] 龚志刚,詹松华,孔营楠,等.高场强头颅柔性线圈的颅脑成像质量的应用价值研究[J].放射学实践,2020,35(4):555-559.
[16] 陈辛元,闫雪娜,张凯旋,等.改装高通道线圈实现头颈部放疗模拟定位的可行性研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2020,37(4):397-401.
[17] 吴书裕. 数字乳腺体层合成成像关键技术研究[D].广州:南方医科大学,2017.
[18] 林燕红,陈达元,吴晓涛,等.联合应用磁共振动态增强及弥散加权成像对临床诊断乳腺良恶性肿瘤的意义[J].影像研究与医学应用,2020,4(24):69-70.
[19] 马媛媛,李彦,张雪坤,等.基于T1W-3D序列探讨光梭成像技术的临床应用价值[J].磁共振成像,2021,12(11):52-56.
[20] 李红英,刘加蕾.多参数磁共振成像对乳腺良恶性病变的诊断价值[J].癌症进展,2021,19(14):1429-1432,1455.