拆除不良修复体后根管再治疗疗效及影响因素分析

中华养生保健 ›› 2022, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (21): 51-53.

拆除不良修复体后根管再治疗疗效及影响因素分析

热比亚木·哈德尔¹, 徐旭东², 杨晓燕^3,*

1.新疆生产建设兵团第十三师红星医院口腔科,新疆哈密,839000;
2.新疆生产建设兵团第十三师红星医院急诊科,新疆哈密,839000;
3.新疆生产建设兵团第十三师红星医院药剂科,新疆哈密,839000

出版日期:2022-11-01 发布日期:2022-11-01
通讯作者: ^*杨晓燕,E-mail：rby17699029193@126.com。
作者简介:热比亚木·哈德尔（1983.1-）,女,维吾尔族,籍贯：新疆维吾尔自治区哈密市,本科,主治医师,研究方向：拆除不良修复体后根管再治疗。

Analysis of Curative Effect and Influencing Factors of Root Canal Retreatment after Removal of Bad Restorations

Rebiyamu· Haerder¹, XU Xu-dong², YANG Xiao-yan^3,*

1. Stomatology department, Hongxing hospital, 13th division, Xinjiang production and Construction Corps, Hami Xinjiang, 839000, China;
2. Emergency department, Hongxing hospital, 13th division, Xinjiang production and Construction Corps, Hami Xinjiang, 839000, China;
3. Pharmacy department, Hongxing hospital, 13th division, Xinjiang production and Construction Corps, Hami Xinjiang, 839000, China

Online:2022-11-01 Published:2022-11-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨在患者拆除不良修复体后再使用根管治疗的疗效以及影响因素。方法抽取新疆生产建设兵团第十三师红星医院2019年5月~2022年5月收治的不良修复体患者80例,采用随机数表法分为研究组和对照组,每组40例,其中对照组给予常规治疗,研究组采用根管治疗,对比两组治疗效果、不良反应发生率、治疗前后视觉模拟评分（visual analogue scale,VAS）、牙齿活动度评分、牙周指标等。结果研究组治疗有效率高于对照组（P<0.05）;治疗前两组的VAS、牙齿活动度评分比较,差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）,治疗后两组的VAS、牙齿活动度评分均降低,研究组变化幅度大于对照组（P<0.05）;研究组疼痛、红肿、出血、感染、脓包、咬合障碍、酸胀的不良反应发生率低于对照组,差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）;治疗后研究组牙周袋探诊深度（PPD）、临床附着水平丧失（CAL）、探诊出血（BOP）、龈沟出血指数（SBI）均低于对照组（P<0.05）。结论拆除不良修复体后使用根管治疗,可以明显降低患者不良反应发生情况,降低疼痛以及改善牙齿活动度,在临床具有一定参考价值。

关键词: 不良修复体, 根管治疗, 治疗效果, 不良反应, 不良修复体, 影响因素¹

Abstract: Objective To investigate the efficacy and influencing factors of root canal therapy after removal of bad prosthesis. Methods A total of 80 patients with bad prostheses admitted to the Red Star Hospital of the 13th Division of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps from May 2019 to May 2022 were selected. According to the different treatment methods, the patients were divided into study group and control group by random number table, with 40 patients in each group. The patients in the control group were given routine treatment, and the patients in the study group were treated with root canal therapy. The treatment effects, incidence of adverse reactions, VAS scores, tooth activity scores and periodortal index before and after treatment were compared between the two groups. Results The treatment effective rate of the study group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in VAS and tooth activity scores between the two groups before treatment (P>0.05). The VAS and tooth mobility scores in both groups were decreased, and the change in the study group was greater than that in the control group (P<0.05). The main adverse reactions in the two groups included pain, redness, hemorrhage, infection, pustules, occlusal disturbance, and soreness in the study group. The incidence of adverse reactions in the study group was lower than that in the control group, and the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). After treatment, the periodontal pocket probing depth (PPD), clinical attachment level loss (CAL), bleeding on probing (BOP), and sulcus bleeding index (SBI) in the study group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion The effect of root canal therapy after removing the bad prosthesis can significantly reduce the occurrence of adverse reactions, reduce pain and improve the mobility of tooth, which has a certain reference value in clinical practice.

Key words: bad prosthesis, root canal therapy, therapeutic effect, adverse reactions, bad prosthesis, influence factor

中图分类号:

R781

热比亚木·哈德尔, 徐旭东, 杨晓燕. 拆除不良修复体后根管再治疗疗效及影响因素分析[J]. 中华养生保健, 2022, 40(21): 51-53.

Rebiyamu· Haerder, XU Xu-dong, YANG Xiao-yan. Analysis of Curative Effect and Influencing Factors of Root Canal Retreatment after Removal of Bad Restorations[J]. ZHONGHUA YANGSHENG BAOJIAN, 2022, 40(21): 51-53.

参考文献

[1] 张乐,董宁,曹伟靖,等.Vitapex糊剂与氢氧化钙糊剂根尖诱导术治疗年轻恒牙根管感染患儿的疗效比较研究[J].现代生物医学进展,2020,20(20):183-187.
[2] Fuente J, Sevilleja-Ortiz A, E García-Rojo, et al. Erectile dysfunction is associated with defective L-cysteine/hydrogen sulfide pathway in human corpus cavernosum and penile arteries[J]. European Journal of Pharmacology,2020,884:173370.
[3] 陈飞,史金先,焦鹏,等.不良修复体致前牙区残根残冠患者的牙周手术治疗1例报告及文献复习[J].吉林大学学报(医学版),2018,44(1): 176-180,215.
[4] 王党红. 牙周基础治疗联合冠延长术治疗前牙不良冠修复体所致牙周病的临床疗效观察[J].临床合理用药杂志,2019,11(4):160-162.
[5] 张玉杰,张雪飞,张江畔,等.三联抗生素糊剂与氢氧化钙糊剂在年轻恒牙牙髓炎坏死牙髓血运重建治疗中的应用对比分析[J].解放军预防医学杂志,2020,231(6):58-60.
[6] 谢冰,杨卫东,冯加飞,等.早期开髓减压引流术联合氢氧化钙治疗牙髓炎的疗效及对血清TLR4、CX3CL1的影响[J].武汉大学学报(医学版),2020,41(3):156-159.
[7] 赵香萍. 不同根管填充程度对牙体牙髓病患者治疗效果及疼痛程度的影响[J].中国药物与临床,2021,21(4):635-637.
[8] 陈伟,杨彪,朱群林,等.钢丝结扎自凝塑料捏塑不良修复体并发症的临床分析及治疗[J].西藏医药,2021,42(4):63-65.
[9] Guan Z, Chen X G, Hay J, et al.Stability analysis of clustering of Norris' visual analogue scale: Applying the consensus clustering approach[J]. Medicine,2021,100(17):e25363.
[10] Carina B G, Meijer H, Arjan V, et al.Maxillary implant overdentures retained by use of bars or locator attachments:1-year findings from a randomized controlled trial[J]. Journal of prosthodontic research,2020,64(1):26-33.
[11] 彭春余. 慢性根尖周炎患者首次根管治疗失败的影响因素[J].当代医学,2021,27(34):97-99.
[12] 龙军,龙刚,张红梅.盐酸米诺环素缓释剂联合Cortisomol糊剂根管充填治疗逆行性牙髓炎的中期临床评价[J].口腔材料器械杂志,2020,29(1):50-55.
[13] 孔嘉敏,胡睿,张琰君.改良牙冠延长术对上颌前牙牙体缺损修复患者的修复效果及其影响因素分析[J].现代医学与健康研究(电子版),2021,5(15):115-117.
[14] 宋薇,陈静涛.全冠修复根管与高嵌体修复根管用于后牙牙体缺损患者临床效果分析及预后观察[J].贵州医药,2021,19(4):619-621.
[15] 武玮,郝树立,周玉森,等.牙周基础治疗对2型糖尿病伴慢性牙周炎患者血清生化指标及炎性细胞因子的影响[J].中华全科医学,2020, 18(2):249-251,281.
[16] 刘学军,徐家敏.牙髓血运重建术治疗年轻恒牙根尖周病变的临床及影像学评估[J].口腔医学研究,2020,36(7):630-634.
[17] 张颖,周倩,杨卫东.超声根管治疗联合SonicFill声波树脂修复对Ⅱ类洞牙体缺损慢性根尖周炎患者疗效的影响[J].中国医刊,2020, 55(1):99-102.
[18] 白莲,梅林.桩冠修复牙齿根管再治疗临床病例分析[J].济宁医学院学报,2020,43(4):256-259.