格林模式指导下的康复训练在脑梗死偏瘫患者中的应用

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨脑梗死偏瘫患者采用格林模式指导下的康复训练的效果。方法选取2022年2月—2024年1月聊城市第三人民医院收治的共计86例脑梗死偏瘫患者,以随机数表法分成干预组（n=43）与对照组（n=43）,对照组给予常规康复训练,干预组给予格林模式指导下的康复训练,比较两组康复训练依从性、肢体功能、日常生活能力。结果干预组的康复依从性（97.67%）高于对照组（81.40%）,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。干预前,两组的Fugl-Meyer运动功能评定量表（FMA）（上肢功能、下肢功能）评分比较,差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）;干预后,两组的FMA（上肢功能、下肢功能）评分均高于干预前,且干预组高于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。干预前,两组的MBI评分比较,差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）,干预后,两组MBI评分均高于干预前,且干预组高于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论格林模式指导下的康复训练应用于脑梗死偏瘫患者中,能够提高康复训练依从性,改善肢体功能,提高日常生活能力。

关键词: 格林模式, 康复训练, 脑梗死, 偏瘫

Abstract: Objective To explore the application effect of rehabilitation training guided by Green's model in patients with cerebral infarction hemiplegia. Methods A total of 86 patients with cerebral infarction and hemiplegia from February 2022 to January 2024 who were admitted in the Third People's Hospital of Liaocheng City were selected, and randomly divided into the intervention group (n=43, rehabilitation training guided by the Green's model) and the control group (n=43, routine rehabilitation training). The compliance, limb function, and daily living ability in both groups were compared. Results The rehabilitation compliance of the intervention group (97.67%) was higher than control group (81.40%), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Before intervention, there was no significant difference in the scores of Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA) (upper limb function, lower limb function) between the two groups (P>0.05). After intervention, the FMA (upper limb function and lower limb function) scores of both groups were higher than before intervention, and the intervention group was higher than control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Before intervention, there was no statistically significant difference in Modified Barthel Index (MBI) scores between the two groups (P>0.05). After intervention, MBI scores of the two groups were higher than before intervention, and the intervention group was higher than control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion The application of rehabilitation training guided by the Green's model in patients with cerebral infarction hemiplegia can improve rehabilitation training compliance, enhance limb function, and improve daily living abilities.

Key words: green model, rehabilitation training, cerebral infarction, hemiplegia

中图分类号:

R743.3

张倩倩, 陈露露, 玉晓平. 格林模式指导下的康复训练在脑梗死偏瘫患者中的应用[J]. 中华养生保健, 2025, 43(7): 80-83.

ZHANG Qian-qian, CHEN Lu-lu, YU Xiao-ping. Application of Rehabilitation Training Guided by Green's Model in Patients with Cerebral Infarction and Hemiplegia[J]. ZHONGHUA YANGSHENG BAOJIAN, 2025, 43(7): 80-83.

参考文献

[1] 李璐,刘阿楠,李军红.系统化康复理念指导下的护理干预在脑梗死偏瘫患者中的应用[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2021,27(23):136-139.
[2] 王斌,高松年,刘巧云,等.MOTOmed智能运动反馈训练联合精细化康复训练对脑梗死后偏瘫患者的影响[J].康复学报,2024,34(2):117-123.
[3] 姚雪榕,韦桂静,刘越存,等.认知心理护理配合以格林模式为基础的健康教育对老年急性脑梗死患者负性情绪及睡眠质量的影响[J].中国医药科学,2023,13(19):132-135.
[4] 李昂,王乐,廖芳,等.基于格林模式的健康教育在脑卒中后吞咽障碍患者中的应用[J].护理实践与研究,2024,21(8):1235-1240.
[5] 中华医学会神经病学分会,中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组.中国急性缺血性脑卒中诊治指南2018[J].中华神经科杂志,2018,51(9):666-682.
[6] 陈瑞全,吴建贤,沈显山.中文版Fugl-Meyer运动功能评定量表的最小临床意义变化值的研究[J].安徽医科大学学报,2015,50(4):519-522.
[7] SHAH S, VANCLAY F, COOPER B.Predicting discharge status atcommencement of stroke rehabilitation[J].Stroke,1989,20(6):766-769.
[8] 沃志敏,孟杭,李梦芳,等.以创新扩散理论为基础的循证护理对脑梗死后偏瘫患者的影响[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2024,30(5):68-71.
[9] 阮海燕. 脑梗死合并高血压护理中偏瘫肢体康复训练护理的应用及对患者血压水平与肢体功能的影响[J].心血管病防治知识(学术版),2023,13(33):30-31,35.
[10] 刘淑娴,刘莉玲,方毓芬.良肢位摆放结合偏瘫肢体康复训练对脑梗死伴偏瘫患者康复效果的影响[J].中西医结合护理(中英文),2023,9(4):162-164.
[11] 刁晓丽,李晓红,迟俊涛,等.基于格林模式的健康教育在妊娠期糖尿病患者自我管理中的应用[J].国际护理学杂志,2024,43(5):868-873.
[12] 李志婷,刘红,闫瑞云.早期康复训练对改善急性脑梗死偏瘫患者肌张力及神经功能缺损评分的影响分析[J].贵州医药,2023,47(5):837-839.
[13] 吴芳,李秋,张爽.格林模式健康教育对脑卒中患者介入术后健康行为及神经功能恢复的影响[J].国际护理学杂志,2023,42(14):2570-2573.
[14] 马晶,方菲,杨珠珠.阶梯式康复护理干预在脑梗死后肢体偏瘫患者中的应用[J].中西医结合护理(中英文),2023,9(10):97-99.
[15] 郑奕华,薛芳群,冯彬.基于格林模式的功能锻炼在胫骨平台骨折患者中的应用效果[J].中西医结合护理(中英文),2023,9(9):175-177.
[16] 徐玉方,宋静,王章钰.奥塔戈运动训练联合系统化康复护理对脑梗死偏瘫患者日常生活能力及肢体功能的影响[J].国际护理学杂志,2024,43(2):373-376.
[17] 宁蒙蒙,张超雁,张玉姣.基于格林模式的功能锻炼干预方案在脑梗死偏瘫病人中的应用[J].全科护理,2024,22(13):2497-2500.