氟化泡沫与氟保护漆治疗对学龄前儿童第一恒磨牙龋齿的疗效及经济性分析

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探究氟化泡沫与氟保护漆对学龄前儿童第一恒磨牙龋齿的疗效及经济性分析。方法选取2020年5月—2022年9月玉门市中医医院收治的280例第一恒磨牙龋齿学龄前儿童,按随机数表法分为对照组和试验组,每组140例。对照组开展氟化泡沫治疗,试验组开展氟保护漆治疗,两组均治疗4次。对比两组临床指标、新增龋均、龋面均、总有效率、满意度水平。结果治疗前两组患者的龋均、龋面均比较,差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）;治疗后两组患者的龋均、龋面均值均升高,并且治疗后试验组升高幅度小于对照组,差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）;治疗后试验组患者新增龋均、龋面均值均低于对照组相应值,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。试验组患者治疗总有效率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。试验组患者治疗满意度高于对照组,但是差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论临床上氟保护漆对学龄前儿童第一恒磨牙龋齿治疗有重要意义,既可改善该磨牙龋齿相关指标,又能提高儿童治疗总有效率,家属满意度水平,应用价值显著。

关键词: 学龄前儿童, 第一恒磨牙龋齿, 氟化泡沫, 氟保护漆, 经济性分析

Abstract: Objective To explore the efficacy and economic analysis of fluorinated foam and fluorine protected paint on dental caries of the first permanent molars in preschool children. Methods A total of 280 preschoolers with caries in the first permanent molars admitted to Yumen Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Gansu Province from May 2020 to September 2022 were randomly divided into control group and experimental group with 140 cases in each group. The control group received fluorinated foam treatment and the experimental group received fluorinated protective lacquer treatment. Both groups were treated 4 times. The clinical indexes, average number of new caries, average caries surface, total effective rate and satisfaction level were compared between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference between the two groups before treatment (P>0.05). After treatment, the average caries and the average caries surface of the two groups increased, and after treatment, the increase in the experimental group was less than that in the control group, with significant differences (P<0.05); After treatment, the average of newly added caries and the average of caries surface in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); The total effective rate of patients in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.05); The treatment satisfaction of patients in the experimental group was higher than that of the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusion Fluoride protector is of great significance in clinical treatment. It can not only improve the caries related indicators of the first permanent molars of preschool children, but also improve the total effective rate of children, the satisfaction level of family members, and has significant promotion value.

Key words: preschool children, first permanent molar caries, fluorinated foam, fluorine protective paint, economic analysis

中图分类号:

R788.1

韩雅婷. 氟化泡沫与氟保护漆治疗对学龄前儿童第一恒磨牙龋齿的疗效及经济性分析[J]. 中华养生保健, 2023, 41(13): 43-46.

HAN Ya-ting. Effect and Economic Analysis of Fluorinated Foam and Fluorinated Protective Paint on the First Permanent Molar Caries in Preschool Children[J]. ZHONGHUA YANGSHENG BAOJIAN, 2023, 41(13): 43-46.

参考文献

[1] 郑佳雯,郑苔菁,刘洪宏,等.儿童维生素D水平与龋齿发生风险相关性的Meta分析[J].解放军医学杂志,2020,45(2):192-199.
[2] 张维智,史素丽,吕改华,等. 脑状态指数预测龋齿手术患儿全麻苏醒期躁动的可行性[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2021, 37(4):356-359.
[3] 吴静,陈国平,孟灿,等.安徽省12~15岁儿童恒牙患龋状况分析[J].现代预防医学,2021,48(3):456-458.
[4] 敖川北,李昆仑,邹亚姝,等.欧卡芙氟保护漆A型与多乐氟氟化钠护齿剂预防学龄前儿童龋病的效果对比[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2021,37(3):167-169.
[5] 马文利. 儿童龋齿诊断与治疗的新进展[C]//中国国际科技会议中心,上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院,上海博星展览有限公司.第十七届中国国际口腔器材展览会暨学术研讨会论文集.第十七届中国国际口腔器材展览会暨学术研讨会论文集,2013:52.
[6] 赵丽萍,关飞,时清.窝沟封闭术联合含氟涂料对龋齿患儿龋面均值龋均情况的影响[J].中国药物与临床,2020,20(15):2607-2609.
[7] 杨倩, 秦猛. 伢典微创凝胶治疗小儿龋齿的疗效及对患儿咀嚼功能的影响[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2018, 33(12):2741-2743.
[8] 崔彩霞,胡琛琦.200例学龄前儿童龋齿发生率及家长口腔卫生行为了解情况的分析[J].中国药物与临床,2021,21(24):3968-3970.
[9] 杜琴,李月玲,俞明,等.上海市嘉定区民办幼儿园学龄前儿童龋病与生长发育及营养的关系[J].第二军医大学学报,2018,39(6):675-678.
[10] 李代庆. 儿童龋齿预防中窝沟封闭术联合氟保护漆的临床疗效分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健,2020,35(23):4621-4623.
[11] 席澍,陈唏,王祥锋.颈椎间盘切除联合椎体次全切除植骨内固定治疗对多节段脊髓型颈椎病患者临床疗效神经功能及疼痛的影响[J].河北医学,2022,28(11):1891-1896.
[12] 张文玲. 生物活性玻璃+氟保护漆在老年根面牙本质敏感症患者中的应用观察[J].国际医药卫生导报,2020,26(9):1245-1247.
[13] 傅人杰,沈梅洁,孙佳青,等.超声洁牙术后护牙素联合氟保护漆对牙釉质表面形态恢复的作用研究[J].中国基层医药,2022,29(5):765-7683.
[14] 姜影,林居红,王飞龙,等.护牙素联合氟保护漆促进超声洁牙术后牙釉质表面形态恢复的实验研究[J].第三军医大学学报,2016,38(21):2357-2362.
[15] 王拓,李璐,任世鹏,等. 南充市学龄前儿童龋齿现状及其相关因素分析[J]. 华南预防医学,2021,47(7):857-860.
[16] 朱永翠,翟蕾,苏娟娟,等.氟保护漆与GC护牙素在正畸治疗中抑制牙釉质脱矿的临床效果研究[J].现代口腔医学杂志,2018,32(3):152-155.
[17] 张敏,周艳,曹盈,等.Nd:YAG激光和氟保护漆对牙周基础治疗后根面敏感的短期疗效对比[J].口腔生物医学,2018,9(4):203-205.
[18] 敖川北,李昆仑,邹亚姝,等.欧卡芙氟保护漆A型与多乐氟氟化钠护齿剂预防学龄前儿童龋病的效果对比[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2021,37(3):167-169.
[19] 师歌,裴蓉,单志鸣,等.趣味游戏对学龄前龋齿患儿围治疗期焦虑、恐惧的影响[J].国际精神病学杂志,2021,48(2):366-368.
[20] 李碧娥,刘琪亮,李朝晖.窝沟封闭术联合氟保护漆预防儿童第一恒磨牙龋齿的临床效果[J].国际医药卫生导报,2021,27(13):1996-1998.